The VA Has 3,000 Coronavirus Test Kits. Why Has It Only Used 10 Percent of Them?

John Moore/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

As the coronavirus outbreak spreads to more communities across the United States, the Veterans Administration still has not used roughly 90 percent of its testing kits, leaving many veterans in the dark about whether they have contracted the virus. 

The VA has only administered 322 tests nationwide for COVID-19, the disease caused by coronavirus, but has 3,000 tests available for use, Veterans Affairs spokeswoman Christina Mandreucci told me. Like other federal agencies, the VA uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s guidelines for administering tests, which had been criticized for making it difficult to obtain tests for patients without symptoms unless they had recently been in China or close to a confirmed COVID-19 carrier. These guidelines were implemented at a time when China was the only major country battling a coronavirus outbreak. That is certainly not the case anymore and, earlier this month, the CDC responded by relaxing its guidelines, which now allow doctors to “use their judgment” to determine if a patient should be tested in accordance with new criteria, including whether the patient resides in an area “where there has been community spread of COVID-19.” 

The United States has lagged far behind other developed countries when it comes to making tests available; despite discovering its first coronavirus case around roughly the same time as South Korea, the United States has administered only 10 percent as many tests. The VA is far from alone in confronting this problem—state and regional governments have made similar mistakes—but its patients feel the effect of the coronavirus outbreak more acutely as the average American veteran is substantially older than the comparable civilian. Of the 322 tests administered so far, the VA has already confirmed five positive cases, is tracking 33 presumptive cases, and, on Monday, acknowledged the first veteran death linked to coronavirus. How the VA responds to the growing outbreak is key not only for veterans who rely on its health care system, but for civilian patients too, as private hospitals feel the strain of more coronavirus patients. The VA is legally designated as a backup health care system in national emergencies and Dr. Richard Stone, leader of the Veterans Health Administration, told the New York Times earlier this week that “the American people should know we are ready.” 

In the past few days, the VA has rapidly increased its pace of testing. On Friday, the department said it had used 140 tests, but by Tuesday, that number was up to 322. VA officials expect roughly 20 percent of patients to test positive for COVID-19 as more tests are completed in next few days, a source familiar with the matter told me. “We expect there to be an uptick very soon when people settle into a routine and start pursuing health care at the VA in greater numbers,” Tom Porter, executive vice president of government affairs for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said, echoing the expert view that the coronavirus crisis in the United States will get worse, not better, soon. “I certainly hope the VA is in the right place to be able to respond to this if it gets much bigger.”

Whether the VA is up to the task is an open question. The department still has not filled nearly 50,000 vacant positions—many of them nurses and medical providers—and in February, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie mysteriously fired his deputy after only five months on the job. During a White House press conference on Wednesday, Wilkie, a member of President Trump’s coronavirus task force, was asked how many veterans “of those who need to be tested” have been tested. “We believe we’ve caught most of them,” Wilkie replied. “Because the president had us out aggressively early, we have been in a better place than most health care systems in the country.”

That sunny assessment is belied by the department’s own recent pleas for help. As part of an emergency request for several federal agencies, the White House asked Congress on Tuesday for $16.7 billion in new funding for the VA. Nearly 80 percent of the funding would go toward the cost of health care, testing kits, protective equipment, and hospital expansion, Politico reported. That funding could augment the VA’s ability to accept civilian patients, and increase its capacity for testing.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate