Tents, Mask Rationing, and Staffing Up: A Renowned Hospital in a Coronavirus Hub Prepares for the Worst

Of all the experts I’ve talked to about the coronavirus this week, Dr. Maria Raven is by far the most cool, calm, and collected. Maybe it shouldn’t come as a surprise: It’s basically a part of her job description as the chief of emergency medicine at UCSF Medical Center, the Bay Area’s largest hospital. Now, the celebrated medical institution is smack dab in the middle of a coronavirus hot spot.

As of Monday afternoon, nearly 300 cases of the infection had been reported in six Bay Area counties, leading officials to call on more than 6 million residents in the counties to shelter in place. San Francisco is suspended in a sense of something like impending doom: As ProPublica recently noted, if the city follows what one set of Harvard researchers considers a “moderate” infection trajectory, more than 100,000 residents would require hospitalization. If those 100,000 cases occurred over a 12-month period—a timeline that is itself a moderate estimate—the city would need “three times the number of available hospital beds and ICU beds it has,” ProPublica reported. 

An accelerated care unit at UCSF, where patients with respiratory symptoms are being triaged.

Noah Berger / UCSF

UCSF has a mere 600 beds at its main campus. Like many hospitals around the country, it has mobilized in recent weeks to prepare for an influx of new patients. “We’ve got all these things in place for if we see a huge surge,” Raven told me on Monday. “Everyone’s waiting with bated breath: like, when is this going to hit?” The hospital canceled elective surgeries to free up manpower, bed space, and, supplies, and it set up “COVID wards” for patients admitted to the hospital with coronavirus. As of Monday, security guards are posted outside the hospital to screen every person as they walk in, asking questions about respiratory symptoms, fevers, and “high-risk contact” with anyone with coronavirus.

Last week, the hospital erected two military-grade tent structures in the parking lot to triage incoming patients with respiratory symptoms: one for less ill, “treat-and-release” patients, the other for more serious cases that may necessitate being admitted to the hospital. It includes things you’d associate with an emergency room: gurneys, X-ray and electrocardiogram machines, computers and wifi. Together, the tents, called accelerated care units, can hold roughly 25 patients at a time. Dozens of patients are already are being treated in the structures each day. 

UCSF is already rationing protective equipment: employees are now reusing masks, gowns, face shields, and the helmet-like gear, called PAPRs, that aren’t visibly soiled, disinfecting them and storing them in big Ziploc bags labeled with their names. (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has okayed reusing protective masks when supplies are running low.) “We don’t want to burn through our [protective equipment] and then not have enough,” Raven explains. For now, the hospital has a two-week supply of most of the gear.

Some clinicians have tested positive for the coronavirus in recent days. A UCSF spokesperson didn’t specify how many, but said, “We have not confirmed any that have been infected while caring for patients. Given the broad community transmission right now, as well as their personal histories, there is reason to believe that all were infected in the community.”

Raven is acutely concerned with protecting the wellbeing of the many health care providers—physicians, nurses, and more—who staff the emergency room. Those with fevers or any hint of sore throat or cough are instructed to stay home. Should more colleagues fall ill, or if there is a big jump in patients, the hospital is staffing more nurses than usual and putting more physicians on backup call. And if need be, providers may be asked to practice outside their speciality; surgeons, for example, could be called on to provide emergency room care. 

“It feels like nothing else I’ve ever been through before, either as a member of society or as a physician,” Raven said. “What we’re seeing in Italy and the other parts of the US are really, really frightening people.” She is hopeful that recent efforts throughout the Bay Area to stay home and socially distance will help. For now, it’s too soon to tell: “We’ll know a lot more in the next week,” she said. 

At the end of our conversation, I asked how Raven herself was doing. She paused. “I don’t think it hit me until this weekend that it’s a lot. It’s a lot of—it’s a heavy prospect.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate