Cory Booker Promises to Grant Clemency to a Record Number of Nonviolent Drug Offenders

If elected president, he says he would reprieve 17,000 prisoners.

Sen. Cory Booker at a presidential campaign stop in New Hampshire in AprilSteven Senne/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, whose presidential campaign has focused largely on criminal justice reform, just made a big promise to incarcerated people: If elected, he pledged Thursday morning, he would immediately initiate clemency proceedings for roughly 17,000 people in prison for nonviolent drug offenses. For perspective, former President Barack Obama granted clemency to about one-tenth that number during his entire time in office—and he used his clemency powers more liberally than any president in decades.

“The War on Drugs has been a war on people, tearing families apart, ruining lives, and disproportionately affecting people of color and low-income individuals—all without making us safer,” Booker said in a statement announcing the plan. 

Under the proposal, Booker said he would sign an executive order to consider clemency for three groups: The first, and one of the biggest beneficiaries, would be people serving time in federal prisons for marijuana-related offenses. Though 25 states have legalized recreational marijuana or decriminalized possession in certain quantities, thousands remain incarcerated in the federal system because of it, with huge racial disparities: According to a 2013 study by the ACLU, black people are nearly four times more likely than white people to be arrested for marijuana offenses, though both groups use the drug at about the same rate.

Not all these people would necessarily leave prison right away. Clemency can take many forms, from commutations (which completely or partially reduce sentences) to pardons (which forgive past crimes) and remissions (which lower financial penalties linked to a conviction). Booker says people who pose a public safety threat would not be included.

Booker would also initiate clemency proceedings for federal prisoners serving lengthy terms because of a major disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. In 2010, Congress reduced the disparity from 100:1 to 18:1, and last year it voted to make that change retroactive, shortening the sentences of about a thousand people so far. A press statement put out by Booker’s campaign says he would go further and use his clemency powers to completely eliminate the crack-powder disparity for federal prisoners, “a reform that should have occurred decades ago.”

Finally, Booker wants to shorten the sentences of thousands of nonviolent drug offenders who weren’t helped by the First Step Act, a major criminal justice reform bill that passed Congress in December with broad bipartisan support. The bill included a host of sentencing reforms, including a reduction of certain mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes. Democrats had hoped the curbs on mandatory minimums would be applied retroactively to people already serving their time, but Republicans only agreed to apply them to new cases. Under his proposal, Booker would begin the clemency process for roughly 3,800 incarcerated people whose punishments would have been shorter had they been convicted after the law passed.

A reprieve for about 17,000 prisoners would far exceed what’s been done by presidents in recent decades. Obama commuted the sentences of 1,715 people and pardoned 212 during his eight years in office—“the highest total for any president since Harry S. Truman,” according to a study by the Pew Research Center, which analyzed data from the Justice Department. (That data did not include clemency offered through executive orders, like the ones Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter used to help thousands of people who evaded the Vietnam War draft.) Trump has pardoned 10 people and commuted the sentences of four people so far.

While many Democratic presidential candidates are talking about criminal justice reform, Booker is among the few, including California Sen. Kamala Harris and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who have made it a centerpiece of campaign efforts. In addition to supporting the First Step Act, Booker has pushed for bills that would legalize marijuana at the federal level; help incarcerated women access free pads and tampons; reform policing practices; and make it easier for people with a criminal record to find employment after incarceration. 

Harris and Klobuchar, both former prosecutors, have also talked about clemency goals, though neither has listed a specific number of people. During a town hall in April, Harris said that if elected, she would “absolutely” use her presidential pardon powers to release federal prisoners convicted of drug crimes. That month, Klobuchar outlined a plan to increase the use of clemency by establishing a bipartisan advisory board, whose members would include criminal justice reform advocates, that would help the president with pardon and commutation decisions. This board would be situated outside the Justice Department, which currently plays a major role in clemency decisions. Booker is similarly proposing the creation of a clemency advisory panel in the White House, as well as a federal interagency council that would make recommendations to the president and Congress about how to help formerly incarcerated people reenter their communities and find jobs.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate