Harvey Weinstein Has Been Found Guilty on 2 Counts in Landmark Rape Trial

Weinstein was convicted of a criminal sexual act in the first degree and rape in the third degree, and acquitted of three other charges.

Scott Heins/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday morning, after five days of deliberations, a New York City jury of seven women and five men has found Harvey Weinstein guilty of a criminal sexual act in the first degree and rape in the third degree. Both charges are felonies, the most serious of which could put Weinstein in prison for 25 years.

Weinstein, 67, was acquitted of the most serious charges, two counts of predatory sexual assault. Weinstein was ordered immediately to jail to await sentencing, which is scheduled for March 11.

The verdict represents the first criminal conviction of a man accused during the MeToo movement, which was jumpstarted in October 2017 by accusations that the powerful movie producer had sexually assaulted and harassed many women over several decades. Since then, more than 100 women have come forward to accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct. From those scores of accusers, Manhattan prosecutors decided that two had cases that could be charged as crimes under New York law. 

In a press conference following the announcement of the verdict, Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance thanked Weinstein’s accusers, saying, “I owe, and we all owe, an immense debt to you, who had the courage beyond measure to speak your story to the world to this courtroom at great personal risk and in great personal pain.”

One woman, an aspiring actor from Washington state who was not named before trial, testified that the film mogul raped her in a midtown Manhattan hotel in 2013. Prosecutors charged Weinstein with first- and third-degree rape stemming from that incident; he was convicted of third-degree rape, indicating that the jury found that Weinstein had lacked consent but did not used physical force. 

Although rape can occur within the context of a relationship, such as an abusive marriage, the case had been seen as challenging to prosecute because the woman continued to have a consensual romantic relationship with Weinstein for years afterward, something the defense team jumped on in its cross-examination. At one point the aggressive questioning prompted the woman to have a breakdown on the stand.

The conviction is a rebuttal to the narrative offered by Weinstein’s defense team, who sought to portray the woman as a manipulator who used her association with the producer to benefit her career. 

The other woman whose testimony formed the basis for criminal charges was Miriam Haley, a former Project Runway production assistant who testified that Weinstein had lunged at her, backed her into a bedroom, and forcibly performed oral sex on her in his Manhattan apartment in 2006. Like the first alleged victim, Haley continued to have a professional relationship with Weinstein, though she testified that he assaulted her again.

To establish a pattern of Weinstein’s “prior bad acts,” prosecutors brought in three additional accusers who took the stand to testify that Weinstein had sexually assaulted them. And to support the predatory sexual assault charges, prosecutors called Sopranos actor Annabella Sciorra to testify that Weinstein had barged into her apartment and raped her in the mid-1990s. (The statute of limitations for that alleged assault has expired.) On Friday, the jury sent a note to Judge James Burke asking if it was permissible for them to be hung on the two counts of predatory sexual assault but still reach a unanimous verdict on the remaining charges. The judge sent them back and asked them to continue deliberating.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate