The Cop Who Killed Breonna Taylor Just Got a New Policing Job

Protests are planned for Monday.

Tamika Palmer, Breonna Taylor's mom, joins protesters on the one-year anniversary of Taylor's death. Chris Tuite/ImageSPACE/MediaPunch/IPX via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Myles Cosgrove, the former Louisville, Kentucky, police officer who fired the shot that killed Breonna Taylor in 2020, just got a new job at a nearby sheriff’s office.

The Carroll County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to local reporters on Saturday that it hired Cosgrove after he passed a background check; following investigations by the state attorney general’s office and federal prosecutors, he never faced criminal charges for his role in Taylor’s death. “This is a prime example of how police officers are protected” and “able to get away with such vicious crimes with no accountability,” Taylor’s aunt Bianca Austin told Mother Jones on Sunday. While she and her family continue to mourn for Taylor, she said, the officers “get to move on living their lives.”

Cosgrove was one of three Louisville officers who shot their weapons during the botched drug raid on Taylor’s home in March 2020. Taylor was a 26-year-old emergency room technician and aspiring nurse. She and her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, were sleeping when seven plainclothes officers broke down her front door with a battering ram. Walker, thinking they were intruders, grabbed a gun and fired a single shot that struck one of them, and the others returned with a barrage of bullets that killed Taylor. Walker called 911 for help, not realizing it was the police who attacked her. The officers did not find drugs on the premises, and the incident led to nationwide protests that grew after a Minneapolis officer killed George Floyd two months later.

The Louisville Metro Police Department fired Cosgrove in January 2021 for failing to “properly identify a target” when he shot 16 times into Taylor’s apartment, and for failing to use his body camera. The department also fired three other officers involved with the raid.

According to an investigation by Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, it was Cosgrove who shot the bullet that killed Taylor. But Cameron did not charge Cosgrove, saying he was justified in shooting because Taylor’s boyfriend fired a weapon first.

Instead, Cameron charged another officer, Brett Hankison—not for attacking Taylor, but for endangering her neighbors by shooting so recklessly. A jury then acquitted him. Federal prosecutors also charged Hankison with civil rights violations and three other officers for their alleged role falsifying a search warrant for the raid, but they are not prosecuting Cosgrove, who they said was not involved in obtaining the warrant and did not know it contained inaccurate information. (Former officer Kelly Goodlett pleaded guilty, while the other officers’ cases are ongoing.) Last year, Cosgrove sued the police department for firing him, but a judge upheld the termination. 

The Carroll County Sheriff’s Office, about an hour northeast of Louisville, cited the lack of criminal charges for Cosgrove as a reason for giving him a new job, along with his two decades of police experience. “We think he will help reduce the flow of drugs in our area and reduce property crimes,” Chief Deputy Rob Miller told the Courier Journal. “We felt like he was a good candidate to help us in our county.” Police accountability activists are planning protests for Monday.

Meanwhile, another officer who shot his weapon during the raid is defending Cosgrove’s right to work in policing again. John Mattingly, who retired from the Louisville police department last year, went on Twitter this weekend to criticize the protesters. “These intolerant crazies want to deprive American citizens, who’ve been cleared, an opportunity at supporting their families,” he wrote. “I’m sick of these social justice warriors, who have no clue what the facts are, spreading lies and misinformation.”

Mattingly wrote a book about the raid and its aftermath. In January, he did a publicity event for it at a restaurant in Kentucky, playing audio of gunshots as diners who had not signed up for the event ate their meals. “These people think they can do whatever they want, say whatever they want,” Austin, Taylor’s aunt, said afterward. “It was just wrong and indecent.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate