Is the BP Atlantis a Ticking Time Bomb?

BP and the government say the offshore platform is safe. Why won’t they prove it?

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/munchicken/218628271/sizes/z/in/photostream/" target="_blank">munchicken</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Offshore drillers rejoiced when Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced on October 12 that the United States was once again “open for business,” just six months after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig began pouring crude into the Gulf of Mexico. But Salazar didn’t mention BP’s other major oil production platform in the Gulf, the one that watchdogs have called a “ticking time bomb” ignored by federal regulators. The BP Atlantis platform is operating in deeper waters and is extracting more oil from the Gulf each day than the Deepwater Horizon well leaked, but neither the company nor the feds have proved it is safe.

Located 124 miles off the Louisiana coast, the Atlantis platform produces 200,000 barrels of oil daily, more than triple the amount of oil that spilled from the Horizon site each day. But long before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a whistleblowing former BP contractor tipped off regulators that the Atlantis may be violating the law, and environmental groups and members of Congress have been publicly questioning the platform’s safety ever since.

According to Kenneth Abbott, a former BP contractor who worked on the platform from 2008 through early 2009, more than 7,000 documents necessary to operate the platform safely are missing or incomplete. Abbott says the vast majority of the project’s subsea piping and instrument diagrams were not approved by engineers, and the safety systems are out of date. In practice, the lack of documentation on this platform would make it extremely difficult to respond in the event of an accident like the Deepwater Horizon blowout, critics say, because no one really has an accurate picture of the Atlantis’ design.

Abbott first aired his concerns to federal regulators in March 2009. In February 2010—two months before the Deepwater Horizon disaster—a group of 19 Democratic House lawmakers led by Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) took up Abbott’s cause, raising concerns about the Atlantis in a letter to regulators at the Minerals Management Service (renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement shortly after the spill), and the agency promised to look into it.

Shortly after the Deepwater Horizon spill brought renewed interest in BP’s conduct in the Gulf, Grijalva and other lawmakers sent another letter asking Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to call for “an immediate shutdown” of the platform “until it can be shown that this platform is operating safely.” The Department rejected that request but said BOEMRE’s investigation would “determine whether any enforcement action…is appropriate.”

That report has been delayed several times and is now five months overdue. So far, BP and BOEMRE have only provided 412 of more than 7,000 documents. In response to Grijalva’s request to see electronic copies of the drawings and other engineering records related to the platform, the agency indicated in a letter that it didn’t plan to provide all the  documents in question.

Instead, BOEMRE gave Grijalva’s office with a letter from BP noting that it “hereby verifies” that the Atlantis has been certified. The letter from BP Exploration & Production vice president Simon Todd, dated August 9, states that the actual certification is on file in the company’s Houston office, but a copy of the certification wasn’t included.

Grijalva pointed to this latest letter from BP as evidence that the platform has run roughshod over regulations, and that BOEMRE has failed to enforce those rules. “If this doesn’t wake Congress and the government up to our oversight and regulatory failures, maybe nothing will,” said Grijalva. “We obtained this evidence with great difficulty, months after we requested it, from an agency that thinks it knows what Congress does and doesn’t need to see to conduct its affairs.”

“The agency continues to turn a blind eye to this,” says Zach Corrigan, a staff attorney with Food & Water Watch. The group has joined with Abbott in a suit in a US District Court in Texas to force BP to shut down the Atlantis until it can prove that it is in compliance. What’s more, Corrigan argues, there may be reason to worry about the other production operations in the Gulf. While the Obama administration put a temporary hold on new deepwater drilling operations, platforms already in production like the Atlantis were not even put on hold to allow inspectors to make sure they didn’t have problems that could cause another spill. “The lifting of the moratorium was completely premature, given that we don’t even know the root cause of the Horizon explosion,” said Corrigan. “There are even larger, even deeper producing platforms like Atlantis that are ticking time bombs.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate