Race to Map Africa’s Forgotten Glaciers Before They Melt Away

A team of scientists and photographers aims to document Africa’s threatened and fading glaciers.

A glacier on Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60635173@N00/1392422436/">Steve236</a>/Flickr


This story first appeared on the Guardian website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Ptolemy thought they were the source of the Nile and called them the Mountains of the Moon because of the perpetual mists that covered them; Stanley claimed to be the first non-African to see their icecap; and the many thousands of subsistence farmers who today live on the slopes of the fabled Rwenzori mountains in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo fear that warming temperatures are devastating their harvests.

While 20,000 people a year scale Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, just a handful of trekkers tackle the lower, 5,100-meter Rwenzori summits and witness the spectacular plant forms that grow in some of the wettest conditions on Earth. The result is that little is known about the condition of the many tropical glaciers that descend off the three peaks of Mount Baker, Mount Speke, and Africa’s third-highest peak, Mount Stanley.

But last month, a microexpedition led by London-based Danish photographer Klaus Thymann returned from Uganda with the best evidence yet that the 43 glaciers found and named in 1906 are still mostly there, but are in dire condition and can be expected to disappear in a decade or two.

Thymann, his journalist colleague Ian Daly, and a team of nine local Ugandans spent 18 days recording Rwenzori’s glaciers from both sides of the range that straddles the equator. “The vast majority have retreated massively on the east side of Mount Stanley; they have practically all gone on Mount Baker, along with the river, and the Grant and Speke glaciers on Mount Speke are now tiny or have practically gone,” Thymann says.

Using an old map to hack through overgrown trails at 4,500 meters, the group traversed the western, Congolese side of the range, where it is believed few, if any, people have been for many years because of insurgency and war.

Perpetual cloud cover makes aerial or satellite photography of the range hard, but going on foot was revelatory, says Thymann. “It’s like a white spot on the map, covered in cloud most of the year. It’s very inaccessible. From the Congo side you can find glaciers unseen in 40 years. It was like rediscovering them. The west Stanley glacier has become detached from its accumulation zone, and the Edward ‘Y’ glacier on Baker has lost an arm.”

Analysis of satellite data in 2006 suggested that the combined area of the Rwenzori glaciers halved from around two square kilometers to just under one square kilometer between 1987 and 2006 and now is even less. “You can see clearly how the glaciers have retreated massively on the east side. The melt is super-intense. It was surprising to find some there at all. They probably don’t have much time left,” Thymann says.

Thymann heads Project Pressure, a collaboration of photographers, scientists, web developers, and cartographers working to document the terminal decline of many of the world’s glaciers and create a virtual record of ice on every continent.

Working with the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) and NASA in the United States, they plan to cover all continents to create the first photographic, interactive “glacier atlas.”

Since 2008, Project Pressure has recorded fast-shrinking glaciers in Argentina, Alaska and Montana, Iceland, Uganda, Nepal, Ecuador, Spain, Switzerland, Chile, and Norway. Later this year, researchers will visit Greenland, Colombia, and Bolivia, and expeditions are being planned to Kamchatka in the Russian far east and New Zealand.

But with tens of thousands of glaciers in nearly 50 countries, their record will be severely limited. “The criteria we use to choose the ones we survey is the speed at which they are receding, how well they have been previously documented and how important they are to local people,” Thymann says. “I think it’s very important to have an artistic impression of what the world looked like before these glaciers are gone forever.”

The work, which will not be formally launched until next year, is endorsed by scientists and feeds into research, but it aims to be artistic.

“We know the Rwenzori glaciers are not going to last long,” says University College London hydrogeologist Richard Taylor, who has studied the Rwenzori ice field and visited the mountains six times. “They are clearly disappearing fast and may be not much more than accumulated blocks of ice slowly atrophying. I can’t see anything that will stop them disappearing, so what Project Pressure is doing is documenting what is there now.

“This is a last chance to see them. In years to come, the ice up there will be a fairy tale for the people who live [near Rwenzori]. This is the evidence of what was there, the proof. It is very helpful.”

Taylor attributes most of the Rwenzori glacier melt to increased air temperature rather than lack of rainfall, which is widely thought to be responsible for the shrinkage of the glaciers on Kilimanjaro in Tanzania: “The rainfall there is many times that on Kilimanjaro. There, the evidence suggests that the glaciers are being starved of moisture, effectively desiccating them rather than melting.”

Four hundred meters below the disappearing icefield, the communities of coffee farmers say that climate change has disrupted rainfall patterns, giving them more intense rains and then drier spells. “But the dying glaciers are not responsible for their problems,” Taylor says. “The glacial discharge from Rwenzori is trivial compared with the three meters of rainwater that falls and collects in the mountain’s bogs and bamboo forests.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate