That Time a Klansman Shoved Skittles in Comedian W. Kamau Bell’s Face

It wasn’t the first time the rainbow candy inadvertently played a role in racial controversies.

taffpix/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Comedian W. Kamau Bell showed up at a Ku Klux Klan rally in Kentucky in 2014 fully expecting to face steely stares and racist comments. (Bell is African American.) He was there to film an episode of his CNN TV show, United Shades of America, but even so, “I had been worried that some of the guys there would really not be okay I was there,” he writes in his 2017 memoir, The Awkward Thoughts of W. Kamau Bell, “and that someone was going to run up and attack me.” But when one of the masked Klansmen did approach Bell, it was to hand him iced tea and Skittles—the snacks Trayvon Martin purchased the night he was killed by George Zimmerman in 2012.

“In that moment, I knew they were trying to get me, they wanted to see if I would crack,” Bell told us on our most recent episode of Bite podcast. Bell told a joke instead, and watched the “phalanx of Klan members” laugh nervously. “Comedy is a way to stop the bigger guy from hurting you,” Bell says. “If you laugh, I have power over you in that moment.”

It wasn’t the first time Skittles inadvertently played a role in racial controversies. Last September, Donald Trump Jr. tweeted a campaign poster for his father that compared Syrian refugee children to the rainbow-colored candy. Trump Jr. has since taken the image on his own tweet down, but you can see it in Wired editor Nicholas Thompson’s disgusted reaction, below:

Trump Jr.’s tweet wasn’t just offensive—he also had his math wrong, argued Washington Post reporter Greg Sargent who posted a video debunking the claim. Data suggests that the “risk of a refugee killing an American in a terrorist attack is 1 in 3.64 billion,” Sargent reported. “Refugees aren’t candy in a bowl, of course—they’re people fleeing war, forced from their homes, trying to save their kids,” he added, akin to Skittles’ maker Mars Inc.’s retort to the offending tweet:

Then, in June, Skittles decided to sell all-white packets of its candy in Europe in support of LGBTQ rights: “During Pride, only one rainbow matters. So we’ve given up ours to show support,” the special edition’s packaging read. But the campaign seemed to have missed the mark—some people saw it as supporting white people, rather than the queer community.

On Bite, Bell talks more about how food can become a cultural symbol, racist or otherwise. He also reveals the key to the most savory gumbo, and who would land an invite to his fantasy dinner party in this trying time in American history.

Bite is Mother Jones’ podcast for people who think hard about their food. Listen to all our episodes here, or subscribe in iTunes or Stitcher or via RSS.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate