Trump Moved to Ease the Farm Labor Shortage—While Also Trying to Cut Workers’ Pay

“There’s been zero effort to ensure that H-2A workers are able to stay safe and healthy during the pandemic.”

dmaroscar/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As the coronavirus lockdown settled in last month, the US government made a decision that sent shockwaves through the agriculture industry: It closed its embassy and consulates throughout Mexico. The move abruptly halted the issuance of new temporary-work permits, known as H-2A visas, for Mexican citizens seeking work in the United States—shutting off a key source of labor. The farms that feed us have grown so reliant on H-2A workers, Mother Jones immigration reporter Fernanda Echavarri explained at the time, that the move “could have massive consequences for American growers and cause a shortage of fruits and vegetables for consumers.” 

On April 15, the Department of Homeland Security sought to ease the labor crunch. The agency issued a temporary order to give employers more flexibility to hire H-2A workers who are already in the United States, in order to “avoid disruptions in lawful agricultural-related employment, protect the nation’s food supply chain, and lessen impacts from the coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency.” Farms in the US have become increasingly reliant on H-2A workers; annual visas issued under the program rose from around 32,000 in 2005 to more than 200,000 last year, representing around 10 percent of the farm labor force. 

The DHS order changes how the visa works in a few different ways. Under normal circumstances, an H-2A worker who has served his or her term with an employer (which usually lasts around six months) would have to return to Mexico and obtain a new visa before reapplying to work at a US farm again. The new DHS order removes that requirement. The policy also allows H-2A workers to stay beyond the current three-year maximum allowable period in the United States. 

But while the new policy may ease labor shortages on farms, it does nothing to alleviate the increasing burden being felt by the workers who keep our food supply moving as the majority of the country remains under stay-at-home orders, farm worker advocates say.

Deemed essential workers by the federal government, the largely immigrant US farm workforce tends to harvest in groups and live in tight quarters, meaning it’s often difficult if not impossible to maintain social distance. “Many farmworkers are reporting that they are not receiving adequate information or protection against COVID-19 and that they do not have access to testing or health care,” Bruce Goldstein, president of Farmworker Justice, wrote in an email. “The Administration has done nothing to require H-2A program employers to provide safety and health protections or access to sick leave or health care.”

Evy Peña, communications and development director for the Mexico-based NGO Centro de los Derechos del Migrante, says the new rules could actually exacerbate an already-steep “power imbalance” between H-2A workers and their bosses. The NGO recently released a report based on interviews with 100 Mexican nationals who had been H-2A workers in the United States within the past four years. They found that most participants arrived to their jobs in debt—for travel expenses and/or recruitment fees—and a third described “restrictions on their movement, such as not being permitted to leave the employer-provided housing or worksite.” Seven of the workers surveyed reported having their passports confiscated by their bosses during their stints—an illegal practice that gives employers complete control over workers’ movements. Under such conditions, the ability to hire workers directly from other farms could enable trafficking, Peña said. 

The challenges faced by H-2A workers have been documented for years. In a 2013 report examining the program’s impact in the South, the Southern Poverty Law Center concluded that guest workers are “routinely cheated out of wages, forced to mortgage their futures to obtain low-wage, temporary jobs, and held virtually captive by employers.” In her 2018 report from California wine country, Mother Jones’ Maddie Oatman found that guest workers there frequently live in isolation, often “prohibited from receiving visitors” at their farmer-supplied living quarters.

The new DHS rules come on the heels of a report from NPR’s Franco Ordoñez that US Department of Agriculture secretary Sonny Perdue is working with new White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to “see how to reduce wage rates for foreign guest workers on American farms, in order to help US farmers struggling during the coronavirus,” citing “US officials and sources familiar with the plans.” 

Perdue has been musing about cutting wages for temporary farmworkers since January, well before the COVID-19 crisis set in. As I explained in a January post, guest-worker wages are set through a mechanism that prevents farmers from paying them less than the prevailing rate in the surrounding area, which would undermine bargaining power for other nearby workers. This “adverse effect wage rate,” calculated for each state by the department of labor using USDA surveys, ranges from in $11.71 in Florida, Alabama, and Georgia to around $15 on the west coast. 

According to Daniel Costa, director of immigration law at the Economic Policy Institute, the nationwide average pay rate for H-2A workers is $12.96 per hour—and the rate is even less in “some of the biggest H-2A states.” So while farm workers continue to risk their lives to keep the nation fed during a global pandemic and economic meltdown, Trump’s USDA is figuring out how to cut their wages, not compensate them with hazard pay. 

Costa called on the labor department to put out an emergency regulation requiring additional spacing in employer-provided housing and on buses, because he says the terms of H-2A employment make the workers especially vulnerable to catching and spreading the coronavirus. “It’s shocking that a number of actions have now been taken to prioritize the ability of employers to get H-2A workers,” he says, “but there’s been zero effort to ensure that H-2A workers are able to stay safe and healthy during the pandemic.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate