Ramblin’ Woman Neko Case

The alt-country star explains those cryptic lyrics, her wanderlust, and why there’s humor in growing up poor.

Dennis Kleinman/Mint Records

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Neko Case was born in Virginia, grew up in Tacoma, Washington, and has called everywhere from Seattle to Chicago home. “I’m basically a hobo—a musical hobo,” she says. For the past several years, the alt-country siren has lived in Tucson—but mostly she’s been on the road, performing both on her own and with power-pop supergroup the New Pornographers. Case recently spoke with Mother Jones about her new album, Middle Cyclone, the funny parts of growing up poor, and what she’d be doing if it weren’t for this whole singing thing.

Mother Jones: Your solo stuff is pretty different from the New Pornographers. What are the differences between playing shows with them and by yourself?

Neko Case: The difference is that [with the NP] I didn’t write the songs, so I can suspend my disbelief. I get to listen to the song while I’m singing the song, which makes it extra fun, because I have no fucking idea what they’re talking about, and I don’t ask them because I don’t want to know. I don’t even know what they’re referring to half the time, but that’s what I like about Dan and Carl. I love the way Dan uses girls’ names all the time. I don’t know if he knows any girls with any of those names, but he always uses girls’ names, which I love.

MJ: Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think you use names much.

NC: Hardly ever. I try not to. There are times when it’s really appropriate, but I don’t usually think that’s a great idea. It’s kind of nice not to know. Have a little bit of mystery left.

MJ: You grew up in Washington, but a lot of people think you’re Canadian. You were recently profiled in the Oxford American, a magazine about Southern culture; you lived in Chicago for a long time. Now you’re in Tucson. I wondered how you came to have so many regional identities.

NC: When you live in a lot of places, you can’t help but have them become part of you. Technically, I am a Southerner, but I did not grow up in the South. So I’m a Southerner by accident, but a Washingtonian.

MJ: You’re a fan of fellow Washingtonian Lynda Barry and her book Cruddy, which is a weird, dark book about a young girl’s Kafka-esque adventures, and you’ve talked before about growing up poor.

NC: I think I identify with Lynda Barry, and Sherman Alexie as well, because they’re really good at explaining what it’s like to be poor growing up in Washington state, which is a very specific thing. And they don’t forget that it’s super funny to be poor, but it’s not a badge of honor. It’s just kind of pathetic and funny—and kind of awesome in this weird way. They remember that specific time so well, and they speak in that vernacular, and they really capture it, and it makes me feel so comfortable and good. It makes joy out of something that probably isn’t that great. But 89 percent of Americans grow up that way.

MJ: All of them can’t be grim and earnest all of the time.

NC: No, not at all. Not that there’s not a place for that; I like grim and earnest. But I don’t feel like a grim, earnest person as a result of growing up that way. Plus, rich kids who write songs about food stamps always piss me off. I’m not going to write any songs about that, either.

MJ: It’s not like your songs are about class issues.

NC: No, not really. I think there’s just a shabbiness to the things I like to describe. I like the shabbiness. Kind of a space-heater aesthetic. A dirty space heater.

MJ: You have a lot of strains of country influence, and that kind of music is so strongly identified with the South.

NC: Anywhere there’s poor people, which means everywhere, there’s country music. Lots of country stars who are really big, like Buck Owens and Loretta Lynn, started their careers in Washington state, which I always find really inspiring.

MJ: Around here [in San Francisco], you’ll ask people what kind of music they like and they’ll say, “Anything but country.”

NC: They really still say that? Or do you think they’re talking about mainstream country, like Kenny Chesney, rather than country music as a whole? You’ll have to ask them to be specific.

MJ: If you encountered a person who said something like that, what country albums would you recommend?

NC: Your Hank Williams and your Johnny Cash. Those records are always really important. Dolly Parton is really important, because she was a major songwriter, and I remember being a kid and seeing Dolly Parton not only singing, but playing guitar, and playing songs she wrote. Country/western has always gotten a real rap for being sexist, at least in the ’70s and ’80s, and I thought that was funny, because women were writing their own songs and playing guitars on stage in front of people way more than they were in pop music.

MJ: What is your favorite book? And have any books inspired songs?

NC: Well, I don’t have a favorite book, but I think Watership Down is probably the most influential book of my life. When I was a kid that’s the book that turned me into a ravenous reader, and I still read and love that book. There are songs that’ve, you know…”Margaret Versus Pauline” is based on a Richard Brautigan story, but not on the story. I just took two of the characters and made them into other people. It’s not related, but it’s inspired by it.

MJ: There’s a lot of sleeping and dreaming in this album. Are your dreams a source of inspiration?

NC: “Prison Girls” came from a dream. Lots of parts of the songs come from dreams. I write them down.

MJ: There’s also a lot of “carpe diem” imagery on this album. In “Magpie to the Morning” there’s that line that goes, “Say the magpie to the morning / don’t let this fading summer pass you by.” And someone’s running from death in the song “Fever.” Am I sensing a theme?

NC: I’m sure there’s a lot of that in there. I hate to see things wasted. Time. Lives. You name it. Paper. That makes me crazy.

MJ: If you weren’t a singer, what job would you choose?

NC: I’d want to be the lady wearing the brown outfit who releases the cougar from the cage on the back of the truck. You know? Just being on all the nature shows where the cougar’s just done being in rehab and it’s going back into the wild.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate