Let Them Eat Diamonds

A breathless pop cultural odyssey through “Cartier and America.”

Nick Welsh/Cartier

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There’s something funny about the inherent excess of hosting a diamond extravaganza while Rome, in a manner of speaking, burns. The arts, however, go on flaunting sparkly objects in spite of Wall Street’s accountability deficit. And so, two Thursdays ago, I woke up as I often do: Dressed in all of my usual pauper’s rags, reruns of The Golden Girls playing on the television, unpaid bills strewn across the pile of shredded newspaper that I sleep on. “Today is a special day,” I thought, wiping sleep from my eyes and unemployment paystubs from my shirt front. “Today I will preview an exhibition of priceless Cartier diamonds.”

Because I’m a cash-strapped reporter, I always take public transportation when attending any kind of diamond jubilee. I find that riding the bus gives me time to think about how I wish I never had to ride the bus again. I boarded one bound for San Francisco’s Legion of Honor and “Cartier and America,” a retrospective of the highfalutin French jeweler’s past one hundred years in the Home of the You-Know-What.

At the museum, a security guard ushered me into a room filled with 18th-century English porcelain and members of the press (many of whom, coincidentally, bore a passing resemblance to 18th-century English porcelain). A few people looked at me like I shouldn’t be there, and then it was time for the opening remarks.
 

San Francisco socialite and philanthropist Dede Wilsey took to the podium, announcing “Rarely do I go someplace that I covet a great deal of jewelry.” Her theatrical presence and wit brought to mind her stepson Sean Wilsey’s searing memoir Oh the Glory of It All, in which he writes:

Her eyes are brown and sharp, and she’s always fit, though it’s a strange, almost inanimate kind of health, sharp, too—like the health of a knife. It’s difficult to imagine Dede sick or aged. Inside her I imagine wheels and racks and cogs covered in pink-and-green chintz, with lipstick-stained lapdogs making it all turn.

Personally, I found her a welcome contrast to my own inelegant indigence, and passed out with delight when she concluded by saying “There’s absolutely nothing that enhances a woman like diamonds… when you’re tired.”

After a reporter from France Today revived me with smelling salts, a soigné Cartier representative named Pierre appeared, joined by the museum’s curator of European decorative arts, to lead us on a diamond-related vision quest that, for me, quickly devolved into a psychedelic, associative pop cultural fantasia.

The first gewgaw on display was a “Mystery Clock” modeled after a shinto gate. These clocks, with platinum-and-diamond hands that appeared to float around the dial, became to Cartier what the egg became to Faberge. This one had been made for Ganna Walska, a terrible opera singer who inspired the shrill character of Susan Alexander in Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane.

Next came two stunning rock crystal bracelets acquired by Gloria Swanson and worn by her in Sunset Boulevard.

After that we discussed the gargantuan rock that drunken Welshman Richard Burton bought for sacred monster Elizabeth Taylor in 1969. Blinded by its preposterousness, I recalled, in my distress, the indecipherable thirty-second commercial for “White Diamonds.” And who could forget the legend in question acting wilder than a peach orchard boar in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Heiresses, screen icons, eye-popping ice: The decorative arts, if you look very closely, relate to the prevailing cultural myths of their time. That “Cartier and America” chooses to sidestep the recession obsession of the moment may feel incongruous if, like me, you don’t own any mid-20th century diamond suites and recently spent a year and a half on unemployment after being laid off. Even still, I will always prefer museum exhibitions of inappropriately expensive art objects to overdraft fees, threadbare clothing, and letters from the IRS asking for back taxes owed from the 2007 fiscal year. Who would want to look at those things when you could look at diamonds?    

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate