Dua Lipa Wants You to Take a Break From the End of the World and Dance

Her voice is loud and clear.

Doug Peters/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Dua Lipa declares her aspirations with her first line: “You want a timeless song, I wanna change the game.” On Future Nostalgia, Lipa’s sophomore album, she crafts a pop hit with all the qualities of a sci-fi flick from the 1960s (clean, crisp color) or the spacey work of architect John Lautner (who she name-checks in line two). Her point isn’t to last forever. It is to dance, now. It’s what I’d like to call “end of the world pop.”

End-of-the-world pop is not a new phenomenon. And it doesn’t have to mean the world is actually ending. You’re actually probably all too familiar with it: It’s the strain of pop that includes the likes of Lady Gaga’s The Fame Monster, Kesha’s, well, entire discography, and Katy Perry’s Teenage Dream. (Britney Spears’ on-the-nose classic, “Til the World Ends” can come too.) It’s a type of pop music that isn’t “timeless” but so of its moment, so defining, that even the end of the world can’t stop you enjoying it.

Lipa is neither the first nor the last pop girl to navigate these waters. Future Nostalgia‘s name only proves she’s aware that we’ll remember her sound as the one that marked our moment. (“My sound, my sound,” she sings, “future nostalgia.”)

In some ways, Lipa didn’t have a choice but to be this bold. Her debut album, self-titled Dua Lipa, launched the British star into the mainstream with the sleeper hit “Blow My Mind (Mwah)” and the radio-ready “New Rules.” She landed collabs (and massive hits) with the likes of Calvin Harris and Diplo. Those collaborations—paired with a well-received debut—positioned her as the next hitmaker in pop music. No pressure. Then she won the Grammy for Best New Artist in 2019.

The single “Don’t Start Now,” was released in 2019 and delivered on the promise. It was the nu-disco hit that’s become her highest-charting track yet. “Lipa’s new music isn’t innovating on classic pop sounds to create something new,” writes Joseph Longo at MEL Magazine. “It’s more of a tribute—a return to comfortably recognizable tunes.” (Her next single, “Physical,” was a more-than-obvious throwback to Olivia Newton John’s 1981 song of the same name.)

All was going well until her album leaked—moving up the release date. Even amid the mess, Future Nostalgia has landed confidently.

The tracks never once lose steam, each one holding as much potential as the next to be a single. It’s a lot to ask of an audience, and only few can pull it off. But for every “Don’t Start Now” and “Physical” there’s a “Pretty Please” and “Boys Will Be Boys.” While the technical aspects of the songs lend them to evoking different initial emotions—higher BPM’s, higher energy—Dua’s vocal delivery is uniform, matching the feminist strings of “Boys Will Be Boys” to the energy of “Physical.”

Future Nostalgia’s influences are everywhere, from the Kylie Minogue tinted beats of “Hallucinate” to the INXS-sampled “Break My Heart.” (The video for “Break My Heart” not-so-subtly includes a pre-choreographed TikTok dance—a great new way for artists to juice their songs.) The Tove Lo cowrite “Cool” is a Prince-meets-Gwen-Stefani joint that gives Carly Rae Jepsen a run for her money.

Dua Lipa’s voice is loud and clear: Dance, crush, be happy, and forget about what you imagined the future to be. Then, you’ll only be nostalgic for her, now.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate