9 Wall Street Execs Who Cashed In on the Crisis

Meet the moguls who made out like bandits.

Xinhua/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


After Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley announced hefty profits last fall, the Obama administration’s pay czar said that he’d cap pay at Citigroup, Bank of America, and five other bailed-out companies. The move was largely symbolic: It capped salaries for only 25 executives, kept big stock bonuses in place, and did nothing to address the culture of rewarding folks who sowed our economic destruction. Below, some of the players who made out like bandits during the bubble and the bailout.

CLICK ON EACH WALL STREET EXEC BELOW TO SEE THEIR COMPENSATION MEASURED AGAINST THEIR FIRM’S BAILOUT

Legend

Joseph Cassano

Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products Executive, 1987-2008

AIG

CLAIM TO FAME: Mr. Credit-Default Swap. In 2008, his unit cost AIG $99 billion. (AIG then paid $1.5 billion in bonuses and awards.)

QUOTE: Before the crash: “It is hard for us…to even see a scenario within any kind of realm of reason that would see us losing $1 in any of those transactions.”

HIS BONUS, 2008: $34 million

HIS HAUL, 2000-2008: $280 million

AIG’S TARP: $69.8 billion

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $112 billion

Vikram Pandit

Vikram Pandit, Citigroup CEO, 2007-present

Citigroup

CLAIM TO FAME: Ordered a $50 million private jet, announced huge layoffs, and jacked up credit card APRs—after getting bailed out

QUOTE: Told Congress last February, “My salary should be $1 per year with no bonus.” Didn’t mention that he took $1.6 million in stock options as Citi lost $18.7 billion in 2008.

HIS HAUL, 2008: $10.8 million

Robert Rubin

Robert Rubin, Citigroup Board of Directors, 1999-2009

Citigroup

CLAIM TO FAME: As Clinton’s treasury secretary, he pushed to overturn regulations prohibiting finance-bank hybrids such as…Citigroup. QUOTE: Wishes he could have reined in Citi but “I don’t know what I could have done” as just a board member.

HIS HAUL, 1999-2009: $124 million

CITI’S TARP: $45 billion ($20 billion repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $328.7 billion

Ken Lewis

Ken Lewis, Bank of America CEO and President, 2001-2009

Bank of America

CLAIM TO FAME: Okayed $3.6 billion of Merrill Lynch bonuses when buying the troubled firm. Said he’d return $1 million in past earnings, but still gets a $53 million pension.

QUOTE: He’s against regulating “the banks that caused this mess” because they’d been “held accountable by the toughest, most unforgiving master of all: the free market.”

HIS HAUL, 2008: $10 million

HIS HAUL, 2001-2007: $145 million

B of A’s TARP: $45 billion (repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $18.1 billion

Jaimie Dimon

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase CEO and President, 2005-present

JP Morgan

CLAIM TO FAME: Cutting comments (“That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard!”) and cutting perks (“You’re a businessman. Pay for your own Wall Street Journal.”)

QUOTE: Over lunch at the Four Seasons: “Corporations can waste a tremendous amount of money. It’s destructive. It’s wrong.”

HIS HAUL, 2008: $19.7 million

HIS HAUL, 2005-2007: $95.7 million

JPMC’S TARP: $25 billion (repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $73.1 billion

Lloyd Blankfein

Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs CEO and Chairman, 2006-present

Goldman Sachs

CLAIM TO FAME: Oversaw Goldman’s risky bets on the housing bubble, then turned the investment firm into a bank so it could get TARP money

QUOTE: Says the financial industry looks “self-serving and greedy in hindsight” but that he’s been “doing God’s work.”

HIS HAUL, 2008: $42.9 million

HIS HAUL, 2006-2007: $114.4 million

GOLDMAN’S TARP: $10 billion (repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $43.4 billion

John G. Stumpf

John G. Stumpf, Wells Fargo CEO, 2007-present

Wells Fargo

CLAIM TO FAME: Made a tidy $12.6 million in first six months on the job

QUOTE: Asked before Congress about his 2007 pay, he conceded that he’d gotten $67 million in stock—but “at the values that pertained in 2007, which wouldn’t look familiar to you now.”

HIS HAUL, 2008: $13.8 million

WELLS’ TARP: $25 billion (repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $13.4 billion

John J. Mack

John J. Mack, Morgan Stanley CEO, 2005-2009, and Chairman, 2005-present

Morgan Stanley

CLAIM TO FAME: Earned the sobriquet Mack the Knife by slashing jobs. His battle cry: “There’s blood in the water; let’s go kill!”

QUOTE: Told Congress, “If you gave me no bonus in the best year, I would still be here,” but later griped that smaller post-bust bonuses led to “an exodus of key people.”

HIS HAUL, 2008: $1.2 million

HIS HAUL, 2005-2007: $77.7 million

MORGAN’S TARP: $10 billion (repaid)

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $25.9 billion

John Thain

John Thain, Merrill Lynch CEO, 2007-2009

Merrill Lynch

CLAIM TO FAME: Asked for a $10 million-plus bonus as Merrill lost $27.6 billion in 2008. Then redid his office for $1.2 million and approved bonuses all around. As the firm’s hidden debts nearly scuttled its sale to B of A, he headed to Vail.

QUOTE: Bonuses were “the right thing to do for…the reward of the people who were performing.”

HIS HAUL, 2007: $83.1 million

MERRILL’S TARP: $10 billion

ADDITIONAL BAILOUT: $6.8 billion

This chart is part of Mother Jones’ coverage of the financial crisis, one year later.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate