Explaining Obama’s Proposed ‘Budget Freeze’

What’s the deal with the president’s controversial spending freeze?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

This story first appeared on the ProPublica website.

Last week in his State of the Union address, President Obama announced a spending freeze. This week, he unveiled a budget that would increase federal spending by 5 percent over this fiscal year’s budget and increase the federal deficit to a record-breaking $1.56 trillion.

What gives?

The announced freeze is on most non-military discretionary spending in the federal budget, which will have a large impact on some federal agencies, but will not do much to slow down overall federal spending.
Jump to next paragraph

We at ProPublica have run the numbers, and found the freeze will impact only about one-eighth of the federal budget. What’s more, over the last 10 years the frozen portion of the budget has grown at about half the rate of non-frozen spending.

What in tarnation is non-military discretionary spending? Much of the federal budget is non-optional. Interest payments on the federal deficit must be paid, and the law establishes a legal right to Social Security benefits, so Congress can’t simply decide not to pay them. Take out that spending, and you’re left with about a third of the total federal budget that Congress can spend according to its, well, discretion.

A portion of that spending goes for defense which, while it may be discretionary, is generally not considered optional in the same way as spending for, say, the Department of the Interior.

Take that away and you’re left with about a sixth of total federal outlays. But according to the president (and clarifications by administration officials), not even all of that spending is subject to a freeze. It would not apply to the departments of Veterans Affairs and Homeland Security, nor Medicare and Medicaid, among other programs.

Subtract all those non-frozen items from the 2010 budget and you’re left with $447 billion. For the years 2011 through 2013, that will be the total budget available each year for federal departments such as Education and Health and Human Services, and agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA. The freeze means that for the years 2011 through 2013, the maximum budget for these departments and agencies will be … $447 billion. That amount is about 12 percent of the total federal budget for 2010.

Rut or cut? Because of inflation, the $447 billion will have less buying power in 2013 than it does now – so the agencies’ budgets will effectively be shrinking each year. (Inflation is currently 2.7 percent.)

How will the freeze work? Though the total budget for these programs is frozen, that doesn’t mean that they are all locked into their 2010 budgets. The administration’s budget dramatically increases spending in some areas – like education – that are subject to the freeze. That means cuts to other spending to make room under the budget cap. The president’s budget, for example, scuttles NASA’s $100 billion effort to return astronauts to the moon.

How much money will be saved? The administration estimates the freeze will save about $250 billion over the next 10 years (for various reasons the budgetary impact will extend beyond 2013).

Will it actually happen? Now that Obama has released his budget, we can see which specific programs are winners and losers. But that’s not the end of the story: Congress still needs to approve the budget. And the fiscal year doesn’t start until October, so the freeze wouldn’t take effect until then anyway.

The list of agencies and departments affected by the proposed budget freeze:

Department
or other unit
President’s
2011 Budget (Billions)
% Change
from 2010
Health and Human Services $83.5 -0.7%
Transportation $77.6 2.1%
Education $49.7 6.2%
Housing and Urban Development $41.6 -4.6%
Justice $24.1 -12.4%
Agriculture $23.9 -4.4%
Other Agencies $20.2 4.1%
NASA $19 1.6%
Energy $17.1 3.6%
Labor $14 -2.1%
Treasury $13.9 2.2%
Interior $12 -0.8%
Social Security Administration $10.1 8.6%
Environmental Protection Agency $10 -2.9%
Commerce $8.9 -36.0%
National Science Foundation $7.4 7.2%
Corps of Engineers $4.9 -9.3%
Corporation for National and Community Service $1.4 16.7%
Small Business Administration $1 25.0%
General Services Administration $0.7 16.7%
State and Other International Programs $0.1 0.0%

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate