OWS: Time to Withdraw From Big Banks

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/keegstra/5521687270/e">Yuri Keegstra</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Nearly one month into the Wall Street occupation, critics are bemoaning the movement’s inability to funnel its rage into something actionable. But some participants are letting their money do the talking—by taking their cash out of the hands of corporate financial giants altogether. Bank Transfer Day, launched on Facebook and racking up an attendance list of 45,000+, urges major bank account holders to transfer their funds into community banks or local credit unions by November 5 (Guy Fawkes Day).

This event comes on the heels of a recent hike in fees at large national banks. Bank of America, Citibank, and Wells Fargo have recently announced plans to charge customers $3 to $5 per month for using a debit card. Frank Keating, President and CEO of the American Bankers Association, lays the blame for the fee hike on the Durbin amendment. Introduced by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the amendment puts a federal cap on the swipe fees banks collect from merchants when customers make debit card purchases, amounting to a projected $1 billion loss in profit for the banks. 

But Durbin wasn’t too pleased with the effect his legislation is having on big banks. “It’s hard to believe that a bank would impose such a fee on loyal customers, who simply are trying to access their own money,” he said on the Senate floor earlier this month.”Bank of America customers…get the heck out of that bank.”

Ron Lieber, a personal finance columnist for the New York Times, told NPR that banks “feel the need to make up the money that they’ve lost. Now, need is an interesting word in this context…theoretically they could earn less and not pass on the cost to customers, but they are choosing to pass the cost off.”

Credit unions and community banks may see an uptick in customers who are fed up with this increase in fees from megabanks. Last Tuesday, CO-OP Financial Services reported that credit unions are providing the same level of access as large national banks. To date, more than 90 million Americans belong to a credit union and are benefiting from low interest rates, shared branching, and over 28,000 ATMs available for 3,000 credit unions, located in various retail locations including 7-Elevens, Costco, and Walgreens outlets.

George Hofheimer, chief researcher at the Filene Research Institute, tells Mother Jones that “some of the top myths about credit unions (CUs) is about service and access. Some consumers perceive CUs as unsophisticated, but most credit unions are full service retail financial institutions. Around access, consumers aren’t aware of the many collaborative features of CUs like shared branching and shared ATM networks.” As for Bank Transfer Day’s impact, Hofheimer adds, “there’s a tremendous amount of inertia on the consumer side regarding switching financial institutions. Bank Transfer Day may give consumers the nudge they need to reconsider whether their banking relationship is right for them in the long term.” 

Some customers have already started to pull the plug on their accounts at major banks, to the dismay of their bankers. In Santa Cruz, a woman was kicked out of a local Bank of America because, according to a bank teller, “you cannot be a protestor and a customer at the same time.”

To make the transition into credit unions easier, Representative Brad Miller (D-N.C.) introduced a new bill to Congress called the Freedom and Mobility in Banking Act. In a press release, Miller declares, “as megabanks flirt with menus of new fees, an increasing number of Americans will want to switch banks…unfortunately customers who might benefit from opening a new bank account…are often dissuaded from doing so because of the considerable incovenience it can entail.” The bill attempts to prohibit abusive fees and charges associated with closing an account and will give consumers the right to close at any time. Backed by the AFL-CIO, Consumer Federation of America, and the Conference on Civil and Human Rights, this bill couldn’t come at a more appropriate time.

(And if you’re contemplating a move, this how-to-guide on how to close your account, prepared by consumer advocate Alex Bogusky’s FearLess Revolution blog, and FindACreditUnion.com, may come in handy.)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate