A Womb With a View

On Thursday, anti-abortion groups conducted live ultrasounds to the Capitol to advocate for a controversial new law.

Photo by Kate Sheppard

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Members of Congress hear from lobbyists of all stripes on any given day in Washington. But on Thursday, anti-abortion groups decided to bring a new lobby to the Hill: the fetus. Voices from the Womb—sponsored by a trio of anti-abortion groups—was promoted as offering the first live ultrasounds in the Capitol building. Over the course of two hours, half a dozen women had public ultrasounds, an anti-abortion member of Congress cried on stage, and ministers prayed for the passage of new legislation to end abortion.

“There’s one person who has not come to DC yet to testify,” said Rev. Patrick Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition. “That is, until today: That’s the millions of pre-born children.”

The ultrasounds happened in the Capitol Visitors Center against the backdrop of the House considering a controversial anti-abortion bill, the Protect Life Act. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-Pa.), would allow federally funded hospitals to refuse to provide abortion services, even if the life of the mother is at risk. The hospitals wouldn’t even be required to transfer the woman to another hospital that would provide the abortion. It would also prevent people who receive tax credits for health care from purchasing insurance that covers abortion services. Many health care experts believe this would lead most private health insurance companies to stop covering abortion. The bill would also allow states to pass their own laws to opt out of the new federal rule requiring insurers to offer no-cost birth control. The House is slated to vote on Pitt’s bill Thursday evening. [UPDATE: The House passed the legislation on Thursday evening. It’s not expected to get any traction in the Senate, however.]

One of Pitts’ staffers, Mary O’Connor, participated in the public ultrasound on Thursday, showing her 15 1/2-week-old fetus on the screen. About three inches long at this point in gestation, Swindell likened it to a peanut as it flashed across the screen. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), and Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) all were on hand. “You can’t tell if it’s a boy or a girl,” joked Franks in his remarks. “But can you tell if it’s a Democrat or a Republican? That’s something I would hope you can find out.” Franks teared up talking about his own twins, a daughter and son. “I am convinced that that day will come when the sunlight of life will break through these crowds,” Franks continued, choking up again, “and shine on the faces of the little unborn children.”

The event kicked off with the ultrasound of a woman 19 weeks pregnant in the auditorium of the Capitol Visitor Center. “That’s pretty obvious,” proclaimed event cosponsor Brandi Swindell, the founder of Idaho crisis pregnancy center Stanton Healthcare. “That’s a baby in there.” Ultrasound technician Dana Miller played the audio of the heat beat and described what was projected on the giant movie screen—a head, back bone, eye sockets. “So he or she is looking at you,” Miller cooed. “With the arm up, right by the head.” The crowd of around 150 onlookers ate it up. “Wow!” someone said aloud.

“The detail is so absolutely incredible,” said Swindell, a pretty blonde in a black pencil skirt and taupe pumps. “It’s hard to imagine that there are people who want to deny the humanity of the preborn child.” Representatives from the Christian Defense Coalition and the National Pro-Life Center also participated in the event. The office of Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) reserved the auditorium for the event, though the congressman wasn’t able to make it due to time conflicts, according to organizers.

The women who participated ranged from 7 1/2 weeks to 30 weeks pregnant. What the event’s speakers failed to mention is that half of all abortions happen within the first eight weeks after conception, and 88 percent occur in the first three months of pregnancy. It is only rare cases, usually those where the health of the mother or the fetus itself is at risk, that a woman as far along as most of those featured on Thursday would seek an abortion. But amorphous blobs aren’t quite as compelling as images of third-trimester fetuses.

Renee Doyle, a legislative assistant for Rep. Michele Bachmann, was also on hand to speak about the congresswoman’s own recently introduced bill, the Heartbeat Informed Consent Act, which would force women to view an ultrasound of a fetus and hear audio of the heartbeat before she can obtain an abortion. Bachmann’s bill is the national equivalent of laws that passed in Florida and Texas this year. The name is borrowed from legislation proposed in Ohio that would ban abortion at the point that a heartbeat is detectable in the fetus—as early as six weeks after conception.

This brand of legislation is directly aimed at reducing the number of abortions. Mahoney claimed that abortion opponents could achieve an 83 percent reduction in abortions simply by forcing women to view an ultrasound. But there’s a bigger goal—particularly with the Thursday public ultrasound session—which is building their case that a fetus merits the same protection under the law as a person. “If we can prove it’s a life, Roe v. Wade is invalid,” said Mahoney. Organizers hope that the next ultrasound event will move outside of the Capitol Visitors Center auditorium and into a hearing room. “Can you imagine, Sen. Wicker,” Mahoney said to the highest-ranking of their guests, “how exciting it would be to have this in a hearing? To have the voice of the children themselves?”

The event wrapped up with a prayer from Mahoney for the passage of the Protect Life Act in the House later that day, and that the “voices” of the ultrasounds would be heard: “How awesome is it that even though they couldn’t go on the floor, they are testifying here?”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate