How the US Just Did Away With Its Biggest Nuke (Video)

The B53 nuclear bomb:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nnsanews/6263233211/sizes/l/in/set-72157627937731182/">National Nuclear Security Administration</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The United States’ ability to annihilate millions of people at a time is a little weaker than it was last week. The agency in charge of America’s nuclear arsenal announced Tuesday that it’s finished dismantling the country’s oldest, biggest A-bomb, the B53.

The disassembly, detailed in the government video below, “is a major accomplishment that has made the world safer and for which everyone involved should be proud,” Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman said in a statement. “Safely and securely dismantling surplus weapons is a critical step along the road to achieving President Obama’s vision of a world without nuclear weapons.”

Obama vowed to do away with nukes in a Prague speech in April 2009, and the past week has seen some encouraging moves in that direction. Last Friday, authorities announced they had dismantled the final remnants of the W70, a “tactical” nuclear missile program designed for use by small artillery units—the sort of regiments that might roam the countryside of Central Europe in a US-Soviet war that never materialized.

But no disarmament program has been as big, literally, as the elimination of the final B53. A bunker-buster described by the government as “the size of a minivan and approximately 10,000 pounds,” the nine-megaton bomb had the highest explosive yield of any US weapon, 600 times stronger than the one dropped on Hiroshima. When tested on Enewetak Atoll in 1952, it caused lifelong health problems in islanders 140 miles away. According to DOD research from the ’70s, if a B53 were dropped on a population center, anyone within an 18-mile radius would have died immediately of burns; every structure within nine miles would likely be leveled. Its blast would have been nearly the same size as this test shot off Bikini Atoll, the 11-megaton “Castle Romeo” explosion in 1954:

Hans Kristenson, the Federation of American Scientists’ resident expert on nuclear weapons, told Wired this week that the B53’s retirement signals “the end of the era of monster weapons.”

Maybe so, but it’s unclear just how much safer the dismantlements leave us. As the government’s press releases note, the W70 and B53 radioactive pits will remain intact, in storage at the nation’s contractor-run Pantex nuclear weapons assembly plant outside Amarillo, Texas; there, they’ll await final destruction, along with thousands of other backlogged radioactive cores. They could conceivably be restored, along with thousands of “zombified” nukes.

Who could be for such a thing? Stay tuned to find out. In the meantime, watch how a big bomb gets retired:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate