NBC’s New Broadway Drama, “Smash,” Might Actually Be…Good?

Katharine McPhee in NBC's "Smash"Photo courtesy of NBC Universal

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When watching the first two episodes of Smash, it’s hard not to feel a little queasy about the predictability factor. In a serial drama centered around the casting and production of a Broadway musical, of course at least one of the two finalists for the lead female role is going to sleep with the director. But at the half-hour mark of the second episode? Really?

The new NBC series is guilty of several other blench-worthy faults: Too much of the dialogue is clunky or hackneyed. Stock characters abound. There’s a pesky, croissant-fetching assistant at the center of the action who simply will not go away. The interwoven stories are weighed down by pointless subplots—some disposable (a messy divorce from a rich, bimbo-chasing husband), others even more disposable (a songwriter adopting a baby from mainland China).

Miraculously, none of this prevents the show from being instantly addictive. In fact, Smash might just be NBC’s best, most ambitious midseason show since Kings appeared—and quickly disappeared—in Spring 2009.

The hotly anticipated network drama, which premieres February 6 at 10 p.m. EST, kicks off with familiar big-dreams-big-city fare. Karen Cartwright—American Idol alum Katharine McPhee—is a warmhearted twentysomething (you guessed it) waitress from (you guessed it) rural small-town USA, living in (you guessed it) the Big Apple, with a hunger for (…) fame.

After years of fruitless auditions (“Sometimes dreams are hard,” Karen tells her simpleton midwesterner parents), she lands a callback for the starring role in a musical based on the life of Marilyn Monroe. The only thing standing in her way is Ivy Lynn (Broadway veteran Megan Hilty), a voluptuous, big-lipped blonde with a cutthroat attitude and a decade and a half of stage experience. So basically, it’s the “marry” vs. the “fuck or kill” of the theater universe.

With their rivalry serving as the series’ anchor, the show dives into the behind-the-scenes grind of a taking a musical from the drawing board to the Great White Way. Debra Messing and Christian Borle play the intrepid songwriting duo. Oscar winner Anjelica Huston phones it in as Eileen Rand, the gutsy producer. And Jack Davenport—whipping up a debonair, wolfish exaggeration of Sam Mendes—turns in a fine-tuned performance as the British theater/film director.

What makes Smash so watchable isn’t the competent acting or the smooth direction (courtesy of Michael Mayer, the man behind the provocative rock musical Spring Awakening); it’s the original songs. The Marilyn show tunes range from rousing to peppy, from piano bar to pop-orchestral. “Let Me Be Your Star” is pure Broadway—a crowdpleasing melodic mesh of Stephen Schwartz and Jason Robert Brown that has Hilty and McPhee pushing their dueling harmonies to a stirring timbre. “The National Pastime” is an innuendo-drenched big band romp that gets more toe-tapping with repeat listening.

In one scene, Hilty takes Carrie Underwood’s dreadful, bubble-gum-country “Crazy Dreams” and transforms it into a poignant acoustic ballad.

The Theatre-District-certified soundtrack is all thanks to composers (and executive producers) Marc Shaiman and Scott Wittman, two seasoned songwriters whose combined credits include Hairspray, Team America: World Police, “Prop 8: The Musical,” and the disturbingly catchy musical coda to Down with Love.

Smash also quietly impresses through its reinvention of modern pop songs. In one scene, Hilty takes Carrie Underwood’s dreadful, bubble-gum-country “Crazy Dreams” and transforms it into a poignant acoustic ballad that sounds like it could have been an outtake from Joni Mitchell’s Blue.

Because of the pervasive singing and choreography, comparisons to Fox’s hit teen dramedy Glee are all but inevitable. Truth be told, comparing the two makes about as much sense as comparing The Thin Red Line to Inglourious Basterds: Glee celebrates the possibility, naïveté, and sentimentality of a fame-obsessed youth, and revels in MTV-style fantasy. Smash plays on the the realities and disappointments of adulthood, and keeps the flights of stage-queen fancy to a bearable minimum.

Judging by the two episodes, the series is on track to overcome its flaws. It has promise, chops, and verve to spare. But this is NBC, where lasting hour-long hits might as well be anathema, and even shows that do manage to make a splash usually fizzle pretty quickly.

There’s plenty of reasons to be skeptical, and I might be eating my words very soon. For now, though, there’s considerable evidence to suggest that, with Smash, NBC is actually on to something.

And given the network’s recent programming, it’s about damn time.

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate