The XX’s “Coexist” Exquisite but Bloodless

Jamie-James Medina

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The xx
Coexist
Young Turks/XL

When The xx’s self-titled debut made its way into the public consciousness back around late 2009, it was like nothing else I was listening to. Starkly sophisticated, complexly minimal, overtly sexual, deeply felt—I did the aural equivalent of a double-take, and then I was hooked. I suspect many people had a similar reaction, because all of a sudden they were everywhere, prompting the question: Who were these guys anyway, and where had they come from?

That’s when you found out that the band’s members—guitarist Romy Madley Croft, bassist Oliver Sim, and beatmaker Jamie Smith (aka Jamie xx)—were, like, 20 years old, just out of school and living in London. How the hell did they know so much about love and sex and longing—let alone how to put it all to such original music? And perhaps most importantly, when would they make more of it?

Three years and a lot of acclaim later, the band’s formula is essentially the same as on that out-of-nowhere smash debut: slow pace, empty space, sparsely seductive guitar lines, heartfelt vocals whispered directly into your ear. Coexist is an even more intimate record, even breathier and more hushed than their first, and the higher production values afforded by success let you hear every almost-crack in Croft’s and Sim’s voices, particularly on ethereal opening track “Angels,” where Croft delicately winds her way through a mostly-vacant landscape of momentary drumbursts and delicate guitar. And familiar though the band’s sound may now be, their use of negative space can still be a minor revelation, as on “Missing,” where a full four seconds of silence hang between the moment when Sim drops the bombshell “and now there’s no hope for you and me” and the one when the piercing guitar and heartlike beat finally kick back in. 

It’s hard not to wish for a few more songs that seethe with the barely contained desire of the debut.

Coexist is also a darker album, with few moments of lightness or levity. “Try” lilts in a way that could almost be described as upbeat, but a high-pitched, quavering guitar gives the song an eerie cast that doesn’t quite fit, while violin strains add a plaintive note to the simple drums and nimble bassline of “Tides.” “Fiction” is downright ominous, with woozy beats (notes here of the Weeknd, himself an artist clearly influenced by The xx) and deep piano chords sounding in the background as Sim despairs, “I know your face all too well/Still I wake up alone.” 

While the lack of sharp sounds or distinctive structures means that the album tends to run together, especially on the first couple listens, a couple of songs do stand out from the general miasma: the steel drums of “Reunion” are a surprising and welcome addition to an album that specializes in subtraction, while the spot-on “Chained” provides some much-needed edge, building from the initial hushed cymbal roll to the agonized chorus—”We used to get closer than this/Is it something you miss?” lament Croft and Sim over fluttering, swirling synths. The lyrics on these and other songs admittedly tend towards the banally repetitive (“They would be as in love with you as I am/They would be in love, love, love,” and so on), but I suppose no one really listens to The xx for the words, which exist here primarily as vessels to be filled up with the emotion in Croft’s voice. And there’s plenty of that to go around. Even the songs about being in love (as opposed to losing it, or wanting it) are about really complicated love. 

Smith has said that Coexist was influenced by club music, and while that may seem an odd touchstone for an album of quiet, aching slow jams, a few songs do seem to have been written with the dance remix in mind. The morose lyrics of “Sunset”—”I always thought it was sad/When we act like strangers/After all that we had/We act like we had never met”—are anchored by a strong, albeit muffled, pulse that snakes its way into your head. Likewise on “Swept Away,” where a complex rhythm builds over the course of a minute or so in the middle of the song, so you suddenly realize you’re nodding along to a multipart beat where moments before there’d been only yearning sighs. 

In its current iteration, though, most of the album feels better suited for staring deep into someone’s eyes than locking them across a dance floor. Which is a shame: As beautiful as it all sounds, it’s hard not to wish for a few more songs that seethe with the barely contained desire of the debut, that are charged with lustful anticipation rather than anguished longing. The thrill that permeated xx is largely absent this time around—Coexist simmers, smolders, but never quite sparks. This record is about smoke without fire; about building up, not catharsis—and don’t get me wrong, the band has those tricks down to a T. But in paring their sound down as far as it can go, it occasionally gazes too far into the void: Coexist is an exquisite record, but too often a bloodless one. 

Click here for more music coverage from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate