Rep. Darrell Issa: Tea Party-Targeting IRS Staffers Took Their Orders From Washington

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.). <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stanfordcis/7064980455/sizes/m/in/photolist-bLiSxR-bxpbWo-bxpbHo-bxpbMf-bxpbgb-bLiSKM-bLiStT-bLiST8-bxpbNG-bLiSzr-bxpc43-bxpbGs-bxpbpQ-bxpbth-bxpbRS-bxpbFf-bxpbUG-bxpbL5-bLiSfe-bxpbuw-bLiSda-bxpc2m-bxpccL-bxpbZw-bxpc6A-bLiSNx-bxpc8G-cZTdNG-cw8J1Y-2V9G72-2V9G68-6Z8FzM-6Z8Fxv-dYARv9-bwdk2w-bwdjnG-bwdkfd-9bpgrs-bwdjb9-5Exzrk-bwdkqC-9eyTQJ-9eyTZL-bwdwmu/">stanfordcis</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Despite the claims of Obama administration officials, the IRS scandal is not the fault of “rogue” staffers in Cincinnati, according to Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.). No, the chairman of the House oversight committee charges—despite the paucity of evidence backing him up—that it leads all the way back to the agency’s headquarters in Washington.

On CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, Issa made some of his strongest claims yet that top IRS brass knew of, if not directed, the targeting of right-leaning groups applying for tax-exempt status for special scrutiny. Issa also ripped Obama administration officials for denying that the IRS scandal reaches back to Washington.

“The administration is still trying to say there’s a few rogue agents in Cincinnati, when in fact the indication is they were directly being ordered from Washington,” Issa said.

He called White House Press Secretary Jay Carney the administration’s “paid liar” while accusing him of dissembling about the extent of the IRS scandal. Carney, Issa said, is “still making up things about what happens and calling this a local rogue. The reason that [IRS director] Lois Lerner tried to take the Fifth [Amendment when asked to testify before Congress] is not because there’s a rogue in Cincinnati. It’s because this is a problem that was coordinated in all likelihood right out of Washington headquarters. And we’re getting to proving it.”

Issa also suggested—again, without evidence—that tea partiers’ complaints about the agency’s heavy-handed treatment were overlooked because it was an election year. “My gut tells me that too many people knew that this wrongdoing was going on before the election, and at least by some sort of convenient benign neglect allowed it to go on through the election, allowed these groups, these conservative groups, these, if you will, not friends of the president to be disenfranchised through an election,” he said. “Now, I’m not making any allegations as to motive, that they set out to do it. But certainly, people knew it was happening.”

There’s been quite a bit of fallout since the IRS scandal erupted two weeks ago, when Lerner, who runs the IRS division that oversees politically active nonprofits, apologized for the singling out of conservative groups. Lerner is now on paid leave. Steven Miller, the acting commissioner of the IRS when the scandal broke, resigned his position; he was replaced by Danny Werfel, an Obama administration official. Members of the House and Senate have held numerous hearings on the issue, blasting Lerner, Miller, and the Treasury inspector general whose report found numerous examples of wrongdoing but no evidence of political bias. The release of an internal video showing IRS staffers learning a dance called the “Cupid Shuffle” at a 2010 conference has only added to the agency’s woes.

Werfel, the current acting commissioner, will address the video and the IRS’ targeting scandal at Congressional hearings this week.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate