Real-Life Captain Phillips: The Pirates “Did Not Let Me Urinate”

Courtesy of <a href="http://www.captainphillipsmovie.com/site/img/photos/2.jpg">Columbia Pictures</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Captain Phillips, directed by Paul Greengrass, tells the true story of Richard Phillips (played by a New England-accented Tom Hanks), a merchant mariner taken hostage by Somali pirates in 2009. After being held for five days aboard a lifeboat, Phillips was rescued when Navy Seal snipers took out three of his Somali captors. “I share the country’s admiration for the bravery of Captain Phillips and his selfless concern for his crew,” President Obama said in a statement on April 12, 2009. “His courage is a model for all Americans.”

Last week, Phillips attended a special screening of Captain Phillips at the Newseum in Washington, DC. Hanks was there, taking selfies with sailors. Barkhad Abdi (who plays the pirate Abduwali Abdukhadir Muse) was in attendance, as were Navy Commander Frank Castellano (one of the men who saved Phillips) and Greengrass. The 58-year-old English director is a former journalist who directed two other acclaimed docudramas: Bloody Sunday and United 93. “Films aren’t journalism,” Greengrass emphasized while introducing his film, though he argued that dramatizations are capable of conveying certain “truths.”

I caught up with Phillips after the screening and he filled me in on some of the dramatic license taken. (The movie was penned by Billy Ray, who based his screenplay on Phillips’ book A Captain’s Duty.) For instance, toward the end of the film, Phillips asks his abductors if he can pee on the outside of the lifeboat. They allow it. Phillips takes his chance for a potential escape, and begins swimming to safety. The pirates chase and swim after him, and manage to drag him back on to the boat, where they beat him savagely. It’s a tense and dramatic scene, one of the film’s most crucial—but there’s at least one big difference from what went down in real life. “They did not let me urinate,” Phillips says, with a bit of a smile. “So, no, that’s not what happened.” The scene is, however, based on Phillips’ thwarted escape attempt.

“I’m not a huge movie buff,” the real Captain Phillips says.

When asked how accurately Captain Phillips portrays the brutality he suffered at the hands of the pirates, Phillips said the movie actually tones it down. “Oh, it was much worse, the way they tied me up,” he says. “I still have the scars.” Also, a key part of the film involves one pirate slicing open his foot after stepping on broken glass that Phillips’ crew left as a trap. The pirate’s bloody foot is mentioned in practically every scene following the initial injury. “There was no glass,” Phillips says, pointing out yet another bit of Hollywood fiction.

Still, the captain is a big fan of the movie, creative liberties and all. Prior to their introduction, Phillips didn’t really have any idea who Greengrass was. “I’m not a huge movie buff, and hadn’t seen any of his work except for the Bourne movie,” Phillips says. In preparing for the film, Hanks—who Phillips refers to as “your average nice, typical guy”—met with the mariner to nail down the accent and the character. “When I met him I told him if he’s going to play me he’s going to have to put on a little weight and get a little better-looking and he did neither,” Phillips told the Daily News.

And even after his widely covered ordeal, the captain is still doing his thing. Just a couple of weeks ago, Phillips had just returned from sea, leading a crew around Oman, Japan, and elsewhere. The week after, he was in Washington, hanging out with reporters and Tom Hanks.

Here’s a trailer for Captain Phillips, which gets a wide release on Friday:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate