An Anti-Abortion Catfight Heats Up a GOP Senate Race

A new front in the GOP civil war opens up in Georgia.

Original Photo: Pete Marovich/ZUMAPRESS

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A mysterious new anti-abortion group with ties to conservative pundit Erick Erickson has warned Georgia Right to Life, the state’s oldest pro-life group, that it aims to displace the older group as the National Right to Life Committee’s Georgia affiliate.

But the fight, ostensibly over which group is better-positioned to end abortion, looks as though it is calculated to influence Georgia’s competitive Republican Senate primary. “You can’t say what someone else’s motives are,” says Genevieve Wilson, a spokeswoman for Georgia Right to Life, the older group. “But it certainly looks like [the new group] has a political motivation behind it.”

Leaders of each anti-abortion organization have a preferred candidate in the volatile, five-way contest to replace the retiring Sen. Saxby Chambliss. Georgia Right to Life has endorsed GOP Rep. Paul Broun, a congressman since 2007. The new group, Georgia Life Alliance, which was formed two weeks ago, does not mention any candidates on its sparse website. But the group is supported by conservative RedState editor Erick Erickson, who has been outspoken in his support of Senate candidate Karen Handel in this race and during her 2010 campaign for governor.

The stakes are high. Republicans likely need to hold the Georgia seat if they are to retake control of the Senate. And although Georgia’s electorate leans Republican, election analysts such as Nate Cohn of The New York Times have predicted that the Democratic candidate, Michelle Nunn, could score a surprise pickup for Democrats—provided she runs against a weak Republican opponent.

And dispute between Georgia Life Alliance and Georgia Right to Life could shine a spotlight on two Republican candidates who pose that exact problem. Joel McElhannon, a Republican political operative who works with Georgia Life Alliance, has warned that Broun, who offers the media “a gaffe every other day,” could cost Republicans the seat. Broun has called evolution and the Big Bang theory “lies straight from the pit of hell” and referred to the Civil War, in a speech on the floor of the House, as “the Great War of Yankee Aggression.” “Georgia voters tend to be conservative, but on a statewide basis they tend not to be crazy,” McElhannon told National Journal in November. “So that’s a problem for someone like Paul Broun.”

Erickson has said that in a matchup with Nunn, Handel “makes a lot of sense for neutralizing the ‘war on women.'” Yet Handel, a former vice president of the breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is best known for helping pressure the foundation into cutting off $680,000 in grants to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screenings and education programs in early 2012. Komen officials claimed that the group was responding to House Republicans’ investigations of Planned Parenthood’s finances. But the move was largely perceived as political, and facing a tidal wave of public outrage, the foundation reinstated its partnership with the women’s health provider—at which point Handel resigned.

The creation of Georgia Life Alliance may have roots in a spat between Erickson and Georgia Right to Life that unfolded last summer. The US House had just voted to pass legislation banning nearly all abortions at 20 weeks after conception. Broun, who initially supported the bill, voted against it after fellow House Republicans added an exception to the ban for women who became pregnant through rape or incest.

Broun’s vote put him on the fringes of the House Republicans but right in line with Georgia Right to Life, which requires all the politicians it endorses to pledge “protection for all innocent human life from earliest biological beginning through natural death.”

After the vote, Erickson excoriated Georgia Right to Life for its rigidity on RedState. “As far as I am concerned, Georgia Right to Life has now become the Westboro Baptist Church of the pro-life movement,” he wrote on June 19. “Instead of saving souls, they’d rather stone those who are trying to save souls.” He called for anti-abortion activists in Georgia to form a rival group.

On Friday, Georgia Life Alliance will appear before National Right to Life’s credentials committee to argue that it should replace Georgia Right to Life as the national organization’s Georgia affiliate. In contrast to Georgia Right to Life, National Right to Life supports exceptions for rape and incest victims in abortion legislation. But despite this difference, Wilson, the Georgia Right to Life spokeswoman, says her organization’s record—the group has helped make Georgia one of the most anti-abortion rights states in the country—will persuade the national organization to continue recognizing it. The national group’s board of directors will decide the matter Saturday.

Georgia Life Alliance’s website does not clarify its specific positions on exceptions to abortion restrictions. Handel, Broun, Erickson and the officers listed on Georgia Life Alliance’s incorporation documents did not respond to requests for comment. One officer referred question to McElhannon, who did not return phone calls.

Georgia Right to Life has clashed with Handel before. In 2010, when she was running for governor (with Erickson’s support), the group opposed her because she supported narrow exceptions to abortion bans for victims of rape and incest. Handel also supported in vitro fertilization, citing her difficulties having biological children. This led Georgia Right to Life to accuse her of trying to justify the taking lives because she was “barren.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate