Obama’s 5 Most Atrocious Dinner Guests at the US-Africa Leaders Summit

President Obama talks with Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz at the US-Africa summit.Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As the historic US-Africa Leaders Summit winds down in Washington, headlines have been dominated by concerns over ebolacompetition with China, and what food was served at the mega-dinner the White House hosted for attendees. (Papaya flavored with Madagascar vanilla, anyone?) What garnered less attention, however, was the parade of autocrats from the continent that descended on DC for the event.

Maybe the White House was aiming for a spirit of inclusion and engagement, but there hasn’t been much focus on the handful of leaders in attendance who happen to have troubling records on human rights and civil liberties. At a wrap-up press conference today, President Obama spoke in generalities about fighting corruption and protecting civil liberties in Africa, but he declined to single anyone out. Here are a few of the worst offenders who enjoyed the President’s hospitality—and little direct criticism:

Joseph Kabila, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kabila greeted at the White House during the US-Africa summit. Amanda Lucidon/Flickr
 

Kabila, the DRC president, owns one of the poorest human rights records in the world. His called out by the United Nations for making the DRC home to a shockingly widespread rape epidemic. Adding insult to injury, Kabila’s government has mastered the art of re-purposing President Obama’s rhetoric on democratization in Africa to justify its shoddy record, as evidenced by this statement submitted to the White House before the conference.
 

Paul Kagame, Rwanda

Rwandan President Paul Kagame. Russell Watkins/Flickr
 

Kagame, Rwanda’s president, gets a lot of praise for orchestrating the social and economic turnaround of his tiny country in the wake of its devastating genocide. But Africa’s “success story” isn’t perfect: a New York Times profile named him as one of the continent’s most repressive leaders. He has crushed dissent in Rwanda, making it a de facto one-party state, and has allegedly threatened critics. He’s also been accused of ordering his army to fight alongside Congolese rebel groups along the Rwanda-DRC border, prompting the US to withdraw some aid.
 

General Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, Mauritania

Aziz addresses reporters at the US-Africa summit alongside John Kerry. US State Department/Flickr

Aziz came to power in 2009 (after leading coups in 2005 and 2008) in the West African nation, and has amassed a poor human rights record. Amnesty International maintains a rap sheet on his government, which includes arresting and imprisoning political opponents, forced disappearances, and torture. Mauritania is also one of the few countries with an enduring, serious practice of slavery; protesters have recently criticized Aziz’s government for denying the problem.
 

Yoweri Museveni, Uganda

Museveni is greeted at the White House. Amanda Lucidon/Flickr

There are laws on the books in 37 African countries punishing homosexuality, but Uganda’s have galvanized attention as perhaps the continent’s harshest. In February, President Museveni signed a law that punished same-sex sexual activity with life in prison—a law Obama condemned and countered with sanctions. Apparently, it didn’t warrant revoking Museveni’s invitation, even though he appears determined to make life unbearable for his country’s LGBT community. Activists called on Obama to address LGBT persecution in Africa at the summit. He didn’t.

Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, Equatorial Guinea

Obiang and his wife arrive at the White House for the US-Africa summit dinner. Susan Walsh/AP Images

Obiang, president of tiny Equatorial Guinea, came to power in a coup in 1979 and has remained there since. During his long reign (he’s been in power longer than any non-royal world leader), he’s supported the lavish lifestyles of his family and allies with Equatorial Guinea’s considerable oil wealth. Meanwhile, his people remain dirt-poor and live to, on average, the age of 53. Obiang has been singled out by Human Rights Watch for particularly bad human rights abuses: his country has virtually no freedom of the press, no political opposition, and allegations of detainment and torture of political prisoners are widespread.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate