Declassified Documents Reveal the CIA’s Sense of Humor (and Literary Aspirations)

From the "Get Smart" episode "Spy, Spy Birdie."NBC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Within a trove of freshly declassified articles from Studies in Intelligence, the CIA’s in-house journal, we found a number of humor pieces based on the agency’s internal employee evaluations. Here is one such piece in its entirety, from the Spring 1984 issue. The author’s name was, naturally, redacted.

****

PAR-Faits (AND OTHER Faits)

What follow are quotations from Performance Appraisal Reports that Mr. [redacted] compiled over the years, and for which he composed introductory comments. The quotations are rendered faithfully, with typographical and other errors intact, for they contribute to the fun. The subjects, supervisors, and reviewing officials mentioned and quoted in this compilation are to remain forever, and mercifully, anonymous.

The Golden Rule-Redux: “I believe that the readers of this PAR, as well as the previous one written by the Rating Officer, should know that the Rating Officer and I have had and continue to have many strong personal and professional differences of opinion. He believes, for example, that I have reached my level of competency, and I believe that he has exceeded his.”

Mastering the surprise ending: “It should be recognized that by employing the proper technique, very comfortable shoes can be made from a sow’s ear but making [redacted] silk purse requires an entirely different raw material.”

Making no bones about it-in the vernacular: “Subject is also responsible for all Headquarters support of a complex covert action operation aimed at maintaining the political stability of a regime headed up by a weirdo who goes around saying things like ‘dat get me shame’.”

When faint praise is called for: “Operationally, Subject was not loafing.”

For one who skates well on thin ice: “Subject is quick to spot thin stuff and do something about it—particularly when it comes to good operational tradecraft.”

For one who can bench press human dynamics while reciting from Rabindranath Tagore: “His ability in oral expression and human dynamics was strongly demonstrated… “

Growth Potential: “As the period drew to a close, Subjects apparatus had begun taking shape… “

Being hugely successful: “He largely recruited a high level source.”

What to do to protect colleagues from being hit by large and fast moving desks: “Mr. [redacted] continued to be the Elmer’s glue of the large and fast-moving [redacted] Desk.

Almost flawless—so to speak: “His English is flawless, if not close to it.”

When in doubt clutter things up; its good for cover: “He characteristically complicates simple things.”

The smiling, freely offered thumb in the eye: “One thing not noted previously is his calm and pleasant demeanor which tends gratuitously to mask his toughness as a case officer.”

The clairvoyant case officer: “…His operational reporting is often on time, often ahead of time.”

Then there’s this little QP drummer: “He marches to the beat of his own drummer.”

Although not a hot-head: “This officer has a warm mind.”

His eyes are clear but his prose is measured and smoke-watered: “With the perspective of twenty months of overview of his long march, rather than with the smoke-watered eyes of those who peer too closely into his campfire, I conclude that his pace has been measured.”

Big jokes from little mischiefs grow? “…his personal eagerness tends sometimes to lead him into small mischiefs.”

Although an off-quay visionary he can trumpet, and drum, and stomp his foot all at the same time: “He has been like a one-man band trying to cover the waterfront on a far frontier.”

The Good Humor Man endures: “He has endured rapid personnel changes with good humor.”

The hyperactive dog of a case officer: “…He is a man of constant motion—some of it unnecessary…he bloodhounds even the longest odds and opportunities.”

Although some may wonder: “All said and done, Mr. S. is human.”

When tippling leads to being Freud, and the naked truth must be revealed: “At the right psychological moment he unfrocked himself in [redacted] cafe.”

The crawl-on-your-belly-and-hiss approach: “…a target of opportunity whom he approached in his own inimical style.”

Dignity in catastrophe: “Subject handles flaps with aplomb.”

Standing tall in the Lilliput of Liaison: “Due to his height this man should probably be directed along liaison lines or staff work.”

The runaway case officer: “He is not only a self-starter but a self-goer—at times tending to go too fast.”

Unless one speaks quietly and carries a big stick: “The operational carrot is easily lost sight of and is difficult to catch.”

The Case of the Abandoned Suitcase: “He began to pursue ops leads as soon as his suitcase hit the ground.”

The cape-and-dagger jock: “He involves himself athletically in Base and local activities.”

The strong tryer: “I would rate his effort to do the job as strong.”

When finishing working hard on his syntax… “He at least secured his own housing on which he has been working hard to fix up.”

The monosyllabic hot dog: “His performance has been-WOW”

The musty Middle East: “This officer has been associated long enough with Arab affairs. He now needs fresh air.”

After making good strides in the wrong direction… “He has made good strides in the right direction.”

The gritty performer: “This officers performance has been outsanding.”

The forward leaning, vine swinging Case officer: “Mr. K. moved in sure-handed fashion.”

The Compleat hard target Case officer: “He is a hard-nosed supervisor and a hard-headed officer.”

Besieged, bothered and bewildered: “He has reached a standoff with the bureaucracy around him.”

The operational arsonist: “Subject has kept the target fires burning.”

When aptitude isn’t apt: “His apptitude for spelling is poor.”

When he’s not plodding he Lies down, humps his back and makes himself small: “He is steady and defendable.”

Because his compass came in his air freight… “It took the officer less than one week after his arrival here to get his bearings.

Just give him a tune-up, but don’t touch the cheerful plugs: “He tries hard in a situation that has him more stymied than most of us, and he plugs along cheerfully.”

The lean and meaningness officer: “He has brought new energy and meaningness to the program.”

While shunning the unusual infinitude of every day chores… “He handles the usual infinitude of occasional case officer tasks.”

To be some kind of mixed up butterfly… “He needs to get the operational chrysallis out of the political coccoon it is in.”

He trembles at dullness, but— “He confidently attends all sorts of events of interest.”

The wary grunter: “He gives a negative first impression, primarily because he is inarticulate.”

When the anatomy of an Advance Work Plan is necessarily obscure: “Mr. S. has had supervisory responsibility for parts of two I.A.’s…”

Not risking over confidence: “He can look back at this job as ‘pretty well done’.”

The little engine with the retarded spark: “During the reviewing period this officer has made good use of the limited intelligence resources available to him.”

Somewhere down there is gold; it just doesn’t pan out: “Subject probably has much good in him. Somehow, though, it has not come through.”

The tribal wit: ” … he is a happy headhunter.”

In addition to avoiding prickly confrontations… “Subject is not one to sit on his laurels.”

Migratory fixation: “I am looking forward to the next reviewing period when the birds will come home to roost.” (next FR) “They have, and they have settled on the highest branches.”

Seen through a glass darkly: “Insofar as I am able to comprehend it, I have no quarrel with the substance of the rating officer’s comments.”

Click here to view the original document—and “More PAR Bloopers,” courtesy of your favorite spy agency.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate