Here’s What Some of California’s Least-Vaccinated Schools Have to Say for Themselves

“If we attract people who choose not to immunize, it’s not because we recruit them.”

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/tncountryfan/5111493374/in/photolist-8MFJU7-mquCyV-5rDYGP-dTXSXV-fNYvhJ-9Kdaqb-iJgrtw-7cbefW-5zRiDT-a9Va4u-TuwUY-bsp6S5-9xtN8k-pfviCt-9gQW4p-6fiqSY-H8xQm-5LjPxU-2GuQCQ-8uo8HZ-6PpuTz-58CH15-9eCYvh-9uMwc1-cWiaFC-6tZUvt-6agG4h-6Rd1j4-6TsL8v-4eZ7sX-nHK8LR-5rHw8S-8zLN4x-eYJFBU-8BNxg-cmLwXh-PrNFu-bWddqn-pXDMMV-foe94i-q2NQhQ-bWdCva-6VR88r-8kXt2K-5uvFVn-f7xdw3-oKg1Vd-8MFQtA-5n2boB-pzpQiy">Larry Darling</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Lisa McCarthy certainly didn’t set out to run one of the least-vaccinated schools in California.

“If we attract people who choose not to immunize, it’s not because we recruit them,” says McCarthy, dean of education at Maple Village Waldorf, a private elementary school in Long Beach.

Only 3 of Maple Village’s 20 kindergartners, according to current data from the California Department of Public Health, are up to date on their measles, mumps, rubella shot—of which two doses are required. Just 21 kindergarten classes in the state have a lower vaccination rate for MMR. And those numbers are actually an improvement over 2013-14, when Maple Village’s kindergartners had the state’s fourth-lowest rate. (See chart below.)

“I feel like it’s a really personal topic, and I’d almost put it in the category of religion or politics.”

Stats like these put McCarthy and other educators who subscribe to the Waldorf teaching philosophy in a delicate position. Her policy mirrors the official Waldorf policy, which is that there is no policy. The schools neither encourage nor discourage immunization.

Maple Valley “truly and absolutely does not take a stand” on whether parents should vaccinate their kids, McCarthy says. For safety, and her own record-keeping, she solicits details on her students’ medical histories and informs their families what health authorities say they should do if there’s a measles outbreak. But she doesn’t want to alienate families by pressuring them. “I feel like it’s a really personal topic, and I’d almost put it in the category of religion or politics,” she says. “I’m just giving them info. I’m not guiding them one way or the other.”

The median rate of Waldorf kindergartners with personal belief exemptions—which allow the kids to forego state-required shots simply because their parents would prefer not to vaccinate them—is around 44 percent in California, according to Duke sociology professor Kieran Healy. That’s a far higher opt-out rate than for any other category of school, public or private.

To see how administrators were dealing with the measles outbreak—which as of February 13 had sickened 98 people in California and 141 overall this year—I reached out to the 10 schools with the least vaccinated 2013-14 kindergarten classes, according to state health records. Four were Waldorf schools; three agreed to talk with me.

Leah Redwood, an administrator at the Berkeley Rose School—an elementary school with 75 students—says members of the school community have made it clear they want the school to boost its 13 percent kindergarten vaccination rate for MMR. Yelp reviewers, she told me, have posted “defamatory” remarks about the school, even naming a family they believed had an unvaccinated child. Berkeley Rose has also received negative attention on Facebook and Twitter.

Redwood and the other administrators argue that the health department figures can be a poor indicator of Waldorf parents’ beliefs. The state collects its vaccination data each October, when many kindergartners haven’t yet turned six—that’s the age by which children should receive their second MMR shot, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And some parents, they say, do plan to vaccinate their children, but on a delayed schedule.

Yelp reviewers posted “defamatory” remarks about one school, and called out a family by name.

According to state records, Sierra Waldorf School, nestled in the Rawhide Mountains, had the ninth-lowest vaccination rate in California for 2013-14—just 4 out of its 30 kindergartners had the MMR shot. But Kim Pendleton, Sierra Waldorf’s business director, told me that a paperwork glitch prevented her school from submitting its stats for 2014-15. At least half of this year’s incoming class is vaccinated, she says.

A couple of weeks ago, McCarthy and her staff at Maple Village Waldorf assembled a spreadsheet showing which shots each student had or was missing. They identified one kindergartner who had had all his shots but had been mistakenly counted as unvaccinated. Fixing that would bump the school’s MMR vaccination up to 20 percent. (Scientists say 90 to 95 percent of kids must be vaccinated to maintain “herd immunity” for measles, which is highly contagious.)

McCarthy told me she plans to contact parents of kids who have had their first MMR shot, but haven’t had the booster—the state counts those kids as unvaccinated: “That’s not me saying you should get this or not get this, this is just me in my administrator hat saying, ‘Here’s what we’ve got for you.'”

She stresses that all the discussions she’s had, or has witnessed, about vaccination have been amicable. But, she adds, “I also think people are staying away from talking about it.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate