This Case of Alleged Juvenile Sexual Abuse By Female Prison Officers Fits a Frightening Pattern

In one instance, a 16-year-old inmate says a guard plied him with drugs and then took him to her house to have sex.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/stuartmcalpine/6183476085/in/photolist-aqpW1D-9H3eGR-64bgNd-aqsynm-aqskmh-aqspYd-aqpMqV-aqpLy2-aqpGjv-aqsvgd-aqsx4A-4VaMzH-nqodMU-TAQun-TAQ66-q9sDJ-TAPmD-efWRmc-23CdwD-prYcp-prYdf-prYgr-61p9X3-nst8Mj-ii7SC7-5EkgD2-q4vgs4-aqpRQR-aqsueJ-naWiRQ-nuct9e-nuctd2-aqpJnK-nqodmU-naWhYu-naWc5V-d2aWC9-d2aWgJ-d2aWgQ-d2aWgL-d2aWjC-d2aWjs-d2aWBu-q4mQT9-q4mQBC-aqpHmv-qiD8X1-qkK1mk-q4viCp-5SBm1W">Stuart McAlpine</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Five former inmates at a youth detention center in Idaho sued the state’s Department of Juvenile Corrections last week, saying staff at the facility sexually abused them during their stay. The suit’s details are grim. In one case, nurse Valerie Lieteau allegedly plied a 16-year-old boy with street drugs, took him to her house for sex when he was given passes to go home, and eventually got into a fight with a student intern, Esperanza Jimenez, when they discovered they were abusing the same teen.

Of the 1,390 inmates who report being sexually abused by staff, nine in ten are males who say they were victimized by females.

Jimenez also stood guard while Lieteau was having sex with inmates, and she told a group of boys about her own “personal sex addiction.” And when several of the boys wrote notes to the center’s director asking for help, the director did little or nothing. She told one of the boys he “had to go through proper channels to make a complaint about staff.”

These allegations highlight a troubling phenomenon in juvenile detention centers: Of the 1,390 inmates who report being sexually abused by staff, nine in ten are males who say they were victimized by females, according to a 2013 Justice Department report.

The far greater number of boys than girls overall in juvenile detention centers accounts for some, but not all, of that discrepancy, said Linda McFarlane, a deputy executive director at the nonprofit Just Detention International. More information is needed: “Because it’s new data, we haven’t done research into the context and into the dynamics,” she told Mother Jones.

Whether the victims and perpetrators are male or female, “the dynamics of staff abusing their power are very consistent across the board,” McFarlane said. Detention center employees often groom their victims. About two-thirds of the victims in the Justice Department report said they had received gifts or preferential treatment from their abusers. Twenty-one percent said they had been given drugs or alcohol, like the 16-year-old in the Idaho case.

“When you look at the abuse of authority that was described and the use of contraband,” McFarlane said, “that case really just fits in with the pattern that we see.”

In late 2013, the Justice Department began inspecting juvenile detention centers to make sure they properly investigate and punish sexual abuse. But there are reasons to be skeptical about the effectiveness of the American Correctional Association, the organization contracted to do the inspections. It has a record of accrediting prisons with abysmal living conditions, including one that a Texas district court later found had “a substantial risk of physical and sexual abuse from other inmates” and “malicious and sadistic use of force by correctional officers.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate