GOP Uses New Loophole to Crush Democratic Party in Fundraising

Democrats raised barely a tenth of the Republican haul through the new mechanism.

<a href=:"http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-170786798/stock-photo-man-putting-money-in-suit-jacket-pocket-concept-for-corruption-bribing-paying-or-business-wealth.html?src=V6-XVBFdjIInO-hD6IWD_A-1-14">Source</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last December, the outgoing Congress slipped language into a spending bill that created a loophole allowing donors to make much larger contributions to political parties. Both parties supported the rule change at the time. But only one has been able to capitalize on it. According to filings last week, the Republican National Committee has raised nearly 10 times as much as its Democratic counterpart from donors who took advantage of the new loophole.

Following the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision that ushered in an era of unlimited donations to outside groups backing political campaigns, the super-PACs supporting presidential candidates have brought in eye-popping hauls. Jeb Bush’s super-PAC has raised more than $100 million, and a single donor cut a $10 million check to a Ted Cruz super-PAC. Party committees, which have seen their influence diminished as outside money flows freely, have tried to get creative in boosting their fundraising totals. The RNC, which will spend heavily on both the presidential race and congressional battles next year, has been much more successful: It’s raised $63 million this year, including $7.7 million in the month of July. The DNC has raised just $36.4 million, and $4.9 million in July.

That’s a reversal from the last presidential election cycle. In July 2011, as the 2012 election loomed, the DNC had raised $50.6 million, to $43 million for the RNC.

A substantial portion of the Republican advantage comes from the new loophole. Previously, donors could contribute a maximum of $32,400 per year to the party. Now they can give not only $33,400 to the main fundraising accounts of the RNC and DNC (the same amount as last year, adjusted for inflation), but an additional $100,200 to three auxiliary fundraising accounts. That means an individual donor can now give a total of $334,600 a year to either party.

Six-figure donations have flowed to the RNC under the new rules, while Democrats have struggled to find people willing to write such large checks. The RNC has raised nearly $11.1 million from donors who gave to the new auxiliary accounts (ostensibly set up for legal costs, building costs, and the party conventions next summer). In July alone, the RNC had 12 different donors cut checks for $50,000 or more.

The DNC has raised just $1.3 million for these new accounts since the beginning of the year, much of it coming from transfers made by Democratic politicians with cash to spare in their own campaign accounts. In July, the DNC raised only $500,000 for these accounts and had just four donors who wrote checks over $50,000.

Part of the imbalance may come from Republican donors who already have their checkbooks out. Several of the big donors to the RNC in July are major supporters of presidential candidates. The largest contribution to the RNC by far was the $668,000 in donations from Hushang Ansary and his wife. Ansary was part of the Shah of Iran’s inner circle and served as the Shah’s ambassador to the United States before the Iranian Revolution. The Ansarys have donated $2 million to Right to Rise, the super-PAC backing Jeb Bush. Similarly, South Florida financier Bill Edwards donated $360,000 to the Bush super-PAC and $83,200 to the RNC in July.

Several major backers of Wisconsin governor Scott Walker also wrote large checks to the RNC. Ted Kellner and Jon Hammes, owners of the National Basketball Association’s Milwaukee Bucks, who just got Walker’s approval for $250 million in public financing for a new arena, donated a combined $200,000 to Walker’s super-PAC and $150,000 to the RNC in July. Anthony Scaramucci, a New York fundraiser who has taken a lead fundraising role for Walker, donated $33,400 to the RNC’s headquarters account.

In addition to the main committees, each party has two separate arms to raise funds for House and Senate races. Here, too, Republicans hold a lead over Democrats, both in overall fundraising and in donations to the new auxiliary accounts. The National Republican Congressional Committee, which supports House Republicans, has raised $46 million this year, including $3.4 million to the new accounts. The Democratic equivalent, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, out-raised the NRCC by about $690,000 in July. But it still lags overall, with only $40.7 million raised in 2015, of which just $978,000 went to the new accounts.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate