She Didn’t Pick the Resistance. The Resistance Picked Her. Now She’s One of Trump’s Most Fearless Opponents.

Pramila Jayapal is defending immigrants and fighting the Muslim ban.

Pramila Jayapal.

Gluekit; Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Zuma

There were signs of life earlier, fits of obstruction, but the moment when the Democratic Party officially awoke from its stupor and caught up to the reality of President Donald Trump came in the last weekend of January, at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and a half-dozen places like it. On January 27, Trump had signed an executive order halting travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries. The next morning, following an example set by a few colleagues in New York, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a member of Congress for all of 25 days, drove to Sea-Tac in the hopes of staging an intervention. One Somali man had already been put on a flight back to Europe before she arrived, but she feared that more deportations might be imminent.

There was a problem, though—Jayapal had no idea who or how many people were being detained, because Customs and Border Protection officials were refusing to come out and speak with her.

So after hours of haggling and waiting to no avail, Jayapal and a few allies, including fellow Rep. Suzan DelBene, piled into a Port of Seattle bus that snaked around the airport to the baggage handling area. They walked across the tarmac to the CBP office and banged on the door. When it finally opened, they told the CBP agents they had the governor on the line and needed answers. That got them the information they needed—the names of passengers set to be deported—and their intervention bought time for the courts, where lawyers had filed a challenge to the executive order. Late that night, with two would-be deportees already aboard a plane waiting to depart, a federal judge in Seattle, Thomas Zilly, issued a temporary restraining order halting the deportations. When the ordeal was over, Jayapal grabbed a megaphone to address a crowd of about 3,000 protesters inside the terminal.

Jayapal’s intervention was a stopgap fix—a few weeks later Trump would unveil a modified travel ban, parts of which the Supreme Court allowed to go into effect on Monday—but a jolt of life nonetheless for a party struggling with its new role as the opposition. That weekend of spontaneous demonstrations and showdowns with Homeland Security officials has taken on an almost sacred significance as the moment when Democrats stopped playing nice and started getting real.

“I think what I learned, is that just because somebody says you can’t talk to them or just because somebody says they don’t have an answer for you, you don’t stop.”

For the 51-year-old Jayapal, a naturalized citizen from India who spent most of her career as an immigration activist, it was also a return to her roots. “I think what I learned,” she said, offering up a lesson that might be a mantra for Democrats in the months and years ahead, “is that just because somebody says you can’t talk to them or just because somebody says they don’t have an answer for you, you don’t stop.”

When we met at her Capitol Hill office earlier this year, Jayapal had been in Congress for a little more than a month. The space was spartan, mostly empty save for a signed Washington Huskies football helmet and a few family photos. Inspired by the travel ban, she had introduced her first bill the previous day; it would mandate that anyone detained upon entry to the United States receive access to legal counsel.

Jayapal, an early supporter of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders during last year’s Democratic primary, is at the vanguard of a leftward lurch within the Democratic caucus, one that opposes collaboration with Trump or Republicans at all costs. But she is also poised to take on a high profile because the biggest policy fights of the Trump era are playing out on her turf. In DC, she’s found herself reliving the immigration battles she waged for more than a decade as an organizer in Washington state, where she worked the courts and the grassroots to block the expulsion of Muslim immigrants and later was jailed for protesting President Barack Obama’s deportations. Jayapal is a congresswoman for the Trump era, calling for an inside-­outside game of direct action and obstruction.

Jayapal’s politics were shaped by her unconventional path to Congress. In a legislative body that has put issues of immigration front and center, she is one of just 10 representatives who emigrated here from abroad. Born in India and raised in Indonesia, Jayapal moved to the United States at the age of 16 for her freshman year at Georgetown University. She graduated to business school and then a Wall Street investment bank but left after about two years to work on international development projects. In 1995, she won a fellowship to live and write in India.

Her two-year stay, recounted in her 2001 memoir, Pilgrimage to India, sharpened views on globalization and inequality that would become cornerstones of her politics. Expecting to give birth to her first child back in the States, during her second trimester she experienced complications in an Indian city and had to fly to Mumbai to find an adequate hospital. Jayapal offered a harrowing account of her son’s premature birth in a country where medical care was guaranteed only to people—like herself—with means. (Her son is now 20.)

The ordeal also thrust her into the messy world of American immigration policy. Her extended stay on the subcontinent put her at risk of losing her status as a legal permanent resident, and even her insistence that a premature birth constituted extenuating medical circumstances failed to sway the US Immigration and Naturalization Service. When Jayapal finally was allowed to return to Seattle in 1997, she resolved to become an American citizen.

Increasingly her work focused on immigrants, and she served on the board of a nonprofit fighting domestic violence in Seattle’s South Asian community. In the days after 9/11, her phone wouldn’t stop ringing. Muslim women called to complain that their hijabs had been yanked off in public or that rocks had been thrown at them. Jayapal became afraid to wear the wrong clothes, or to let her son leave the house.

One week after the attacks, Jayapal formed Hate Free Zone, a nonprofit devoted to defending Muslims against what she referred to as “ruthless targeting.” After a halal grocery was raided at gunpoint by FBI agents who believed it was transmitting money to Al Qaeda, Jayapal organized protests. “There was actually no evidence,” she says, “that they were in bed with terrorists.”

Hate Free Zone grew steadily in stature during the Bush years, eventually changing its name to OneAmerica and branching out to work on broader issues concerning immigrants. Jayapal was elected to the state Senate in 2014, and when longtime Democratic Rep. Jim McDermott announced his retirement, she jumped into a crowded field. She ran hard to the left, arguing against the Trans-Pacific Partnership and in support of single-payer health care. In a district and a state where Sanders won his caucus in a landslide, she easily bested a field of Democratic challengers.

Now that Jayapal’s in DC, she’s found herself tackling much of the same agenda. She was an early co-sponsor of Michigan Democratic Rep. John Conyers’ Medicare for All Act. In April she and Sanders introduced twin bills to provide free college tuition.

“If you’re an opposition party, you are actively using the power you have to oppose the ideas of the other party.”

Of course, being a back-bench Democrat in Republican-dominated Washington doesn’t offer much in terms of immediate advancement. But she’s comfortable in the minority. “If you’re an opposition party,” she says, “you are actively using the power you have to oppose the ideas of the other party.”

She’s not willing to cut her own party slack, either. Jayapal believes Democrats lost the presidency in 2016 because they failed to recognize the gaps between the policy successes of the Obama years and voters’ lives. “People were okay to admit that they might be doing better than they were eight years ago,” she says. “But they still felt like they were not getting a good shake—and Hillary didn’t respond to that, and neither did the president.”

If her party is still coming to grips with its own shortcomings, she sees signs her colleagues have become a lot more aggressive. Back when she was an activist in Seattle, Jayapal was struck by the loneliness of the fight. Party leaders weren’t rushing to airports to block Bush- and Obama-era deportations. Only one Democratic senator opposed the Patriot Act; only one Democratic representative opposed the war on terror. Jayapal and millions of others marched against the Iraq War, but Democratic politicians rubber-stamped it.

“There were not that many people who were willing to come out and stand up for Muslims or stand up against the abuses of the Bush administration,” she said. “That was post-9/11, so I think there was a lot of fear at the time about exactly what that meant—were they unpatriotic if they stood up?”

But a few weeks into the Trump administration, with the White House flailing angrily in a perpetual crisis of its own making, Jayapal saw something different. “I see this as progress,” she says, “because not only do we have protesters across the country, but we’ve got elected officials from the Democratic Party—and even a few from the Republican Party—who are saying this is outrageous.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate