Democrats Want Proof That Trump Consulted With Military Leaders on Transgender Ban

“As you know, clear communication between the White House and the Pentagon is essential to our nation’s security.”

James K. Mccann/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When President Donald Trump tweeted over the summer that he would ban transgender service members from the military, he claimed to have made the decision with input from generals and military experts. Now, Democrats are demanding proof.

More than 100 Democratic members of the US House of Representatives are asking Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to hand over any letters, emails, telephone transcripts, or meeting logs that would show whether Pentagon officials did in fact advise Trump to block transgender service members prior to the July Twitter announcement. “We seek access to these materials in order to determine whether the president, his national security team, and military leaders are actively coordinating policy with one another, or whether the president’s transgender ban announcement reflected a breakdown in communication,” they wrote in a letter sent to Mattis on Tuesday morning.

Trump’s announcement of the ban surprised defense officials at the time. Sources close to Mattis, who was on vacation when Trump tweeted, reportedly said he had only been given a day’s notice and was horrified that the president had resorted to social media to make such a sweeping statement. The Pentagon referred all related press inquiries that day to the White House, which was unable to immediately clarify how the policy would affect thousands of active-duty transgender troops. Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford, the top military officer, later told the Senate that he has advised administration officials against a ban. 

“When you look at the shock that was evident in the responses from the Pentagon, it would seem there had been no conversation prior to his tweet,” says Rep. A. Donald McEachin (Va.), who drafted the letter to Mattis and is a member of the House Armed Services Committee and the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus. Among the other 115 signatories to the letter are Reps. Joe Kennedy III (Mass.), Pramila Jayapal (Wa.), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), and Caucus Chair Joseph Crowley (N.Y.). If defense officials did not advise Trump to ban transgender service members prior to the tweets, McEachin says, “it would mean at a minimum that the president of the United States has lied to the American public again,” and “that he is turning his back on the LGBT community.” 

In a policy directive from August, Trump clarified that Mattis would have the authority to determine whether active-duty transgender soldiers could continue serving, but that no new transgender recruits would be allowed to join. That reversed an Obama-era policy that had allowed transgender troops to serve openly and that created a road map for the military to accept new transgender recruits soon. Starting in March, Trump’s directive will also reverse an Obama policy that allowed the Pentagon to pay for sex reassignment surgeries of eligible active-duty troops.

Tuesday’s letter to Mattis is the latest congressional push to stop Trump’s policy on transgender service members. Dozens of Democratic senators, including Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, and Elizabeth Warren, wrote to Mattis in July to voice opposition to the proposed ban. And in mid-September, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Jack Reed (D-R.I), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) introduced a bill that would block military leaders from dismissing active-duty soldiers simply because of their gender identities. “Any member of the military who meets the medical and readiness standards should be allowed to serve—including those who are transgender,” McCain wrote.

“We have strong concerns about the process by which your ban was created,” McEachin and other Democratic members of the House wrote to Trump in August. “News reports have characterized your ban as a ‘snap decision’ that ‘caught [the Pentagon] off guard.’ Decisions that touch on national security demand careful consideration and responsible debate.”

Trump has given Mattis until February to consider how to implement the administration’s policy. In the meantime, transgender service members and cadets who have been affected are suing the Trump administration in a bid to stop it from taking effect.

Read the full letter here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate