“I Believe Facebook Hates Our President”: The Bizarre Crusade of a Republican Congressional Candidate in Texas

Thomas Dillingham provided web hosting for pro-Trump sites—until Facebook shut them down.

Mother Jones illustration; YouTube

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Forget Russia’s bots: Home-grown alt-facts are infiltrating the 2018 primaries.

A technology consultant with ties to domestic outlets known for publishing hyperpartisan clickbait—with names like Liberty Writers and Swamp Drain—is running for one of Texas’ eight open congressional seats. And he says he’s doing it to get back at Facebook for shutting down pages for some of those sites.

“[If] I get elected, Mark Zuckerberg is going to sit across the table from me in the halls of Congress,” candidate Thomas Dillingham said in an interview with Mother Jones. “He’s got some explaining to do.”

Dillingham, 43, faces a crowded race. Ten other Republicans are also vying to represent his Dallas-area district in a March 6 primary.

A self-described “Bible-believing Christian,” Dillingham most recently made a living by providing web hosting services for 23 sites similar to Liberty Writers, whose homepage blares “Trump Started Speaking at Disney, SUDDENLY Liberal Thug Did Something Sick.” That ended, he says, when Facebook’s crackdown on fabricated and misleading news drove down readership. Liberty Writers announced on November 9 that its Facebook page was suspended, and the site hasn’t been updated since December. Shortly thereafter, Dillingham says, his business tanked.

Days after the Facebook pages were shuttered, Dillingham took aim at the Facebook on his personal blog: “I believe Facebook hates Christians. I believe Facebook hates Conservatives. And most of all…I believe Facebook hates our president, President Donald J. Trump.” 

The north Texas native started hosting what he characterized as both liberal and conservative political blogs during the 2016 presidential campaign, as Trump’s candidacy ramped up readers’ appetite for fake news, though he admits the pro-Trump sites tended to bring in the most traffic. “These guys were paying 80 percent of my bills,” he says. 

Dillingham says he doesn’t have permission to name the blogs he hosted, and he shrugged off questions of whether the false information they were spreading was damaging. “I was just a website hosting service,” he told Mother Jones.  

On top of hosting, Dillingham also started his own right-leaning news site, Nation One News. Since the outlet’s inception in 2016, Nation One News has garnered 100,000 likes on Facebook. Its most prolific journalist, Michael Moates, has about 34,500 followers on Twitter. (Dillingham says he hasn’t been involved in the site recently, transferring ownership of the outlet to a nonprofit foundation after closing up shop on his web hosting business.)

In a crowded primary, Dillingham is a long-shot candidate. The Dallas Morning News’ editorial board called his campaign “all-but-invisible” in its endorsement of one of Dillingham’s competitors, retired Naval pilot J.K. Ellzey. And the president of the local GOP called another candidate, former Arlington city council member Ron Wright, the race’s front-runner.

But Dillingham remains undeterred. Initially, he says, he planned to run a purely ideological campaign against Ted Cruz in an effort to spread the word about what he believes is Silicon Valley’s bias against Christians, conservatives, and Trump supporters. But when the District 6 seat opened up, Dillingham says, he saw an opportunity to have even more of an impact—and has expanded his platform to be consistent with Trump’s “America First” agenda. 

The district will likely remain in Republican hands, making the primary the most competitive part of the upcoming election. The open seat comes after longtime congressman Joe Barton decided not to run again, thanks to the click-baitiest of reasons: Nude photos of the congressman leaked to the media.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate