Trump Just Hired a Lawyer Who Says the FBI and DOJ Conspired to Frame Trump

Joseph diGenova thinks James Comey framed Scooter Libby, too.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the latest indication that the White House is taking a more combative stance toward Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, President Donald Trump has decided to add Washington lawyer Joseph diGenova to his legal team. DiGenova and his wife, Victoria Toensing, have a long history of engaging in legal work and commentary that advance right-wing causes, and both have been outspoken critics of federal law enforcement officials’ handling of investigations into Hillary Clinton and into Trump associates’ ties to Russia.

The New York Times reported on Monday that Trump is hiring diGenova to add “a more aggressive player” to his legal team. In January, diGenova publicly accused FBI and Justice Department officials of hatching a “brazen plot to illegally exonerate Hillary Clinton” and to “frame Donald Trump with a falsely created crime.” He referred to former FBI director James Comey, who Trump fired, as “America’s most dirty cop” and said that Attorney General Jeff Sessions should appoint a new special counsel or impanel a grand jury to investigate Comey and other current and former FBI and DOJ officials.

DiGenova, a former US attorney who prosecuted aides to former DC Mayor Marion Barry, has also pushed a theory, popular in right-wing publications, that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea for lying to FBI agents. That argument is based on a supposed conflict of interest involving the judge who originally oversaw the case. Former prosecutors have called the notion of Flynn withdrawing his plea farfetched.

DiGenova and Toensing share a law firm and a decades-long history of combining conservative legal activism and punditry to place themselves in the middle of scandals consuming Washington. In 1998, both claimed that they were targeted by a private investigator hired by the Clinton White House due to their frequent television appearances during the Monica Lewinsky scandal—a charge the White House denied. The couple later advocated for Scooter Libby, a former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice related to his role in exposing the identity of former CIA operative Valerie Plame. 

The couple reemerged in the next decade as eager critics of Hillary Clinton. DiGenova in 2016 incorrectly predicted on Laura Ingraham’s radio show that Hillary Clinton would withdraw from the presidential race due to a likely indictment related to her use of a private email server. Comey ultimately announced that he would not recommend that the DOJ charge Clinton with a crime. When Libby had his law license reinstated just days before the 2016 presidential election, diGenova took the opportunity to slam Comey, telling the Daily Caller that “Comey and [former US attorney Patrick] Fitzgerald tried to frame Scooter Libby.”

For her part, Toensing has had several clients involved in various Clinton and Trump-Russia investigations. She represents William Campbell, a former FBI informant who asserted he had information indicating that Clinton had signed off on the sale of a uranium company with assets in the United States due to Russian contributions to her foundation. Egged on by Toensing, Republicans last fall touted Campbell’s claims. But lawmakers seemed to back away from Campbell after the Justice Department informed them that it had doubts about Campbell’s credibility. Campbell failed to provide any evidence supporting his claims during a January interview with congressional staff, Democrats say.

Toensing has also represented Sam Clovis, the former Trump campaign co-chairman, who encouraged efforts by former Trump campaign national security aide George Papadopoulos to use contacts with people the FBI now suspects were Russian intelligence agents to broker a 2016 meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. (No such meeting ever took place.) Clovis withdrew from consideration from a top Department of Agriculture post due to his involvement in the scandal. Toensing has also worked for Erik Prince, the founder of the security contractor Blackwater and brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. Democrats say Prince may have misled the House Intelligence Committee about a January 2017 meeting he attended in the Seychelles with a Russian investor close to Putin.

Trump’s decision to bring on diGenova comes as Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia appears to be accelerating. It follows other indications that Trump has decided to confront Mueller more aggressively, against the advice of many of his advisers, particularly Ty Cobb, the attorney who oversees White House interactions with the special counsel’s team.

Trump in recent days has celebrated Friday’s firing of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. McCabe’s dismissal, just days before he was set to retire, appeared aimed at stopping the FBI veteran from receiving a full pension. Though McCabe faced criticism in an inspector general’s report related to his handling of the Clinton investigation, Trump’s tweets suggest that the president views McCabe’s firing as deeply linked to the Russia probe.

Over the past year, Trump and his lawyers have repeatedly emphasized their desire to cooperate with Mueller’s team. But in his tweets this weekend, Trump publicly attacked Mueller by name, a move he had generally avoided in the past. In a tweet Monday, he referred vaguely to a “total WITCH HUNT with massive conflicts of interest!” Conflicts of interest are among the limited grounds for which Mueller could be legally dismissed. Last June, Trump reportedly pushed White Counsel Donald McGahn to seek Mueller’s firing based on questionable claims that Mueller has a conflict of interest because he once resigned from a Trump-owned golf club over fees and because Mueller talked to Trump about the job of FBI director before becoming special counsel.

Another Trump lawyer, John Dowd, also tied Sessions’ firing of McCabe to the Russia probe, suggesting it was now time for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to remove Mueller, as well. “I pray that…Rosenstein will follow the brilliant and courageous example of the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility and Attorney General Jeff Sessions and bring an end to alleged Russia Collusion investigation manufactured by McCabe’s boss James Comey based upon a fraudulent and corrupt Dossier,” Dowd told the Daily Beast on Saturday. Dowd originally said he was speaking on behalf of Trump, though he later said he was speaking only for himself.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate