History Says Voters Won’t Elect Stacey Abrams as Georgia’s First Black Governor. Polls Suggest Otherwise.

She’s running dead even with Republican firebrand Brian Kemp.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

While the race to become Georgia’s next governor pits two polar opposites—progressive Democrat Stacey Abrams and Trump-backed firebrand Republican Brian Kemp—against each other, polls show them in a dead heat.

A survey of 1,020 likely voters from August 26 to September 4—taken by the University of Georgia’s School of Public and International Affairs for the Atlanta Journal Constitution and Channel 2—shows they’re both polling at 45 percent, reinforcing a few other polls from over the summer that show a very tight race. It’s also the latest sign that Abrams could continue to buck historical precedent and seriously contend, if not outright win, as a black woman in the Deep South, and be the first black woman to ever do so. Abrams handily beat Stacey Evans in the Democratic primary back in July, becoming the first black woman to win a major party nomination for governor in the United States.

Nationally, Democrats have long given lip-service to wanting to turn Georgia blue. But the state hasn’t sent a Democrat to the governor’s mansion in almost two decades. That Abrams—a relative outsider to Georgia’s monied Democratic establishment and the former minority leader in the statehouse—is the one knocking on the door is emblematic of the changes that are afoot in the state’s electorate, particularly in its increasing diversity. But Georgia is so deeply polarized, much like the country at large, and perhaps no race in the country better signifies that than Abrams versus Kemp. 

Abrams touts endorsements from liberal favorites like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris. She talks openly about her own experiences growing up poor, her family’s experiences with incarceration and mental illness, and the government’s responsibility to create safety nets to prevent both. She’s built a national profile, and raised millions of dollars along the way, by positioning herself as a sort of millennial everywoman, writing in her recently-released memoir about struggling to find mentorship in the workplace and learning to manage crushing amounts of student loan debt. And, as I wrote in a profile of her early in 2018, she’s offered up Georgia as a potential laboratory for re-shaping the Democratic party as a whole—not by trying to convert moderate Republicans, but by activating new voters altogether.

Kemp, on the other hand, thinks Georgia’s traditionally white, conservative-leaning electorate is just fine. He describes himself as a Republican who’s so conservative that he’ll track down undocumented immigrants all by himself in his pickup truck. “If you want a politically incorrect conservative with a track record of fighting and winning for our values, then stand with me,” his campaign wrote in one ad during the Republican primary against his more moderate Republican opponent, Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle.

While a lot could change over the next two months, the poll shows that Kemp may need to find new lines of attack on Abrams; his arguments about her debtpointing to the $54,000 in back taxes owed by Abrams as proof that she’s fiscally irresponsible—clearly have not done the damage Kemp’s campaign hoped for. Abrams’s camp has countered that her debt actually makes her more relatable to the younger voters she’s trying to court, many of them saddled with debts of their own. When Abrams was on a live recording of the popular podcast Pod Save America, she made light of it with the audience, telling them, “You may have heard that I have some debt,” and saying that she spent it on others, not herself. To that, the audience cheered.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate