Trump’s USA Today Op-Ed Contains a Brazen Lie

The dishonesty is truly breathtaking.

Paul Hennessy/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

USA Today published a remarkably dishonest op-ed by President Donald Trump on Wednesday, wherein the president (or, more likely, his ghost writer) completely misrepresents his own record on health care policy while lobbing outlandish attacks on Democratic policy positions.

“As a candidate, I promised that we would protect coverage for patients with pre-existing conditions and create new health care insurance options that would lower premiums,” the op-ed declares, adding that he has “kept that promise.” While it’s true that Trump repeatedly made that promise during his presidential campaign, he’s actually done everything in his power to break it since becoming president. Trump spent most of 2017 championing Republican legislation to repeal Obamacare—bills that would have have allowed insurance companies to make policies unaffordable for people with preexisting conditions. When the House passed a bill last year that would have resulted in 24 million fewer people having health insurance, Trump summoned Speaker Paul Ryan and the rest of House leadership to the White House for a celebration. And earlier this year, the Trump administration signaled its support for an ongoing lawsuit to invalidate Obamacare, including the protections for people with preexisting conditions.

Trump also claims that health care premiums have come down on his watch. While it’s true that premiums on the Obamacare marketplaces are stable in 2019, that’s primarily because they already skyrocketed earlier in Trump’s administration thanks to the president’s efforts to weaken the law, such as ending the individual mandate. This handy premium tracker from the Kaiser Family Foundation shows how the average rate has gone up in states under Trump. In 2017, the national average was $359; by 2018, it was $481.

From there, the president pivots to attacking Democrats, arguing that if the party takes control of Congress, the country will turn into a socialist hellscape. “The truth is that the centrist Democratic Party is dead,” the op-ed says. “The new Democrats are radical socialists who want to model America’s economy after Venezuela.”

What’s so bad about the Democrats’ plan? Trump claims they want “open-borders socialism,” but he trains most of his fire on the Medicare-for-all proposals supported by many progressives. While Democrats are increasingly moving toward favoring some sort of single-payer health reform—many of the most prominent 2020 presidential contenders have signed onto a bill introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and even former President Barack Obama has voiced some support—the party is far from united behind the idea. That hasn’t stopped Republicans from running ads attacking Democrats over the policy proposal—even when those candidates haven’t actually endorsed Medicare-for-all.

Trump’s attacks on Medicare-for-all, moreover, are simply bizarre. At one point, the president writes, “The Democrats’ plan also would mean the end of choice for seniors over their own health care decisions. Instead, Democrats would give total power and control over seniors’ health care decisions to the bureaucrats in Washington, DC.” This makes no logical sense, because Medicare is already a federally managed program.

“In practice, the Democratic Party’s so-called Medicare for All would really be Medicare for None,” Trump claims. “Under the Democrats’ plan, today’s Medicare would be forced to die.”

There is no one set policy proposal for single payer or Medicare-for-all. Some proposals would implement major changes to the program, such as ending the Medicare Advantage program, which allows seniors to enroll in a private insurance alternative where Medicare covers the costs. But regardless, most single-payer plans, such as the one introduced by Sanders, would actually increase benefits for seniors by cutting out copays and closing coverage holes. “In fact,” Sanders said in a press release rebutting the president’s op-ed, “we expand benefits. Millions of seniors today cannot afford the dental care, vision care or hearing aids they desperately need because Medicare does not cover these vitally important needs. Our proposal covers them.”

Trump also pushes a standard attack line against single payer—that it could lead to longer waits for doctor’s appointments and tests. In fact, the US already has longer wait times than other industrialized countries, most of which have some form of single-payer health care.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate