Trump’s New Attorney General Is a Global Warming Skeptic

“If there was a president at the end of the Ice Age, they would have also believed in climate change.”

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Donald Trump’s new acting attorney general shares the president’s views on more than just the Russia investigation. As it turns out, Matthew Whitaker—who will oversee the department tasked with defending federal environmental regulations—is also a global warming skeptic. The climate change views expressed by Whitaker, who Trump appointed Wednesday to succeed Jeff Sessions in an acting capacity, align the nation’s top law enforcement official with the wider Trump administration, which is stocked with staffers who reject the overwhelming scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.

During an interview on a Missouri radio station in June 2016, Whitaker said it would be “a little arrogant” for humans to believe they “can have such a dramatic and permanent effect” on the climate. “There is not as much, sort of, evidence as to exactly how much the climate has changed,” he said, adding that “there is a natural warming and cooling cycle you have to believe exists in the long view of the Earth’s history.” On another radio appearance that month, this time with syndicated conservative host Bill Martinez, Whitaker said, “If there was a president at the end of the Ice Age, they would have also believed in climate change.”

A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment about Whitaker’s remarks.

Trump has offered a similar explanation for his administration’s lack of action to combat rising greenhouse emissions, which are the primary driver of global warming. “Is there climate change? Yeah. Will it go back like this, I mean will it change back? Probably,” Trump told Axios last week while making an up-and-down motion with his hand. In the past, he infamously claimed that global warming was a Chinese hoax. In the federally-funded National Climate Assessment, which Trump was handed during the Axios interview, researchers concluded that “it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” The authors noted that “there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence.”

During his Missouri radio interview, Whitaker went on to denounce “draconian climate regulations” on fossil fuels, comparing legal efforts to curb non-renewable sources of energy to regulations on the tobacco and firearm industries. He criticized progressive attorneys general for advancing “these types of intimidation and litigation techniques on industries that are not preferred by their side of the aisle.”

Before serving as Sessions’ chief of staff, Whitaker was executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, which fashioned itself as a conservative watchdog and frequently filed complaints regarding Clinton’s behavior as secretary of State. While at FACT, Whitaker criticized left-leaning states for investigating oil and gas companies who bankrolled climate denial efforts and allegedly misled investors about the impact of climate change. The probes were tantamount to an effort to “criminalize political disagreement,” Whitaker wrote in a blistering op-ed published in Morning Consult. “In doing so, [the state attorneys general] have exposed an undercurrent of hypocrisy in this effort to intimidate those with whom they disagree.”

After Sessions recused himself last year from the Russia investigation, the president loudly and frequently called for loyalty from his attorney general. In Whitaker, Trump selected a former US attorney who shares his skepticism of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry into the Trump campaign’s ties with Russia and a fixation on Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Since Whitaker’s promotion Wednesday, journalists and Democratic lawmakers have drawn attention to his frequent public statements about the Mueller investigation. During an interview last year on the David Webb Show, Whitaker said that “there is no case for obstruction of justice” against Trump. “There’s really nothing here,” he said in another interview about the Mueller investigation. Eighteen state attorneys general have requested that Whitaker recuse himself from overseeing the special counsel’s probe, but he has indicated privately that he does not intend to accede to their demands, the Washington Post reported.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate