The US Has Never Had a Native American Governor. This Idaho Progressive May Change That Tuesday.

Paulette Jordan has run a surprisingly populist campaign.

Madeline Scott/Jordan for Governor

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

At first glance, Paulette Jordan seems like an improbable choice for Idaho governor. She’s a young Native American woman running on a progressive platform in a state that has never had a governor who wasn’t a white man and hasn’t elected a Democrat to the governor’s mansion since 1990. Even Democratic candidates for the office over the last several decades have overwhelmingly been moderate, old white men. The Idaho-Statesman editorial board, in an article endorsing Jordan in the primary, called the middle-aged lawyers and businessmen typically nominated for the Democratic spot “the sacrificial lamb” of the elections.

But this election isn’t like the others. Across the country, an unprecedented number of women, LGBT people, and Native Americans have run for office, and many have won their primaries and are favored to win in November. Like them, Jordan has exceeded Idaho progressives’ expectations, garnering support from surprising places and raking in campaign funds. Jordan, a member of Idaho’s Coeur d’Alene Native American tribe, is banking on grassroots support and distrust of the political machine to propel her to victory. The stakes are high: If she wins in November—besting Brad Little, the 64-year-old lieutenant governor—she’ll become the nation’s first Native American governor, as well as the first woman and person of color to lead Idaho. But regardless of whether she wins, her campaign may change Idaho politics for good. 

Jordan, 6 feet tall and only 38 years old, grew up on a farm on the Coeur d’Alene reservation in rural Idaho, “playing in the field” and horseback riding. She became involved in local activism during college in Seattle, when she worked in the mayor’s office and served as a student representative to the University of Washington president’s advisory board. After graduation she returned to Idaho, and at 28 became the youngest person elected to the Coeur d’Alene Tribal Council, a seat she ran for at the urging of her grandfather, a tribal elder. Jordan says the tribe’s “it takes a village” mentality and the strong female leadership she saw around her affected her choice to get involved in politics and become a leader for her community. 

“My grandmothers were chiefs, my grandfathers were chiefs, and there was no difference between either one,” Jordan told Mother Jones. “I was always destined, in a way, to follow in their path.”

During her time on the council, Jordan was involved in the expansion of a health care facility run by the Coeur d’Alene tribe and located on the reservation. In 2014 she ran for the state Legislature, an office she held until early this year, when she resigned to start her gubernatorial campaign. In the Statehouse, Jordan co-sponsored a loan forgiveness bill for rural teachers and was the lone vote against a bill to punish sanctuary cities, an effort by the state’s conservative Legislature to show solidarity with President Donald Trump, who in January 2017 signed an executive order penalizing sanctuary cities for not cooperating with his administration. 

Jordan’s gubernatorial campaign has focused on many of the same issues. In a debate earlier this month, Jordan defended sanctuary cities, although she stopped short of joining in the resistance-left’s calls to end Immigration and Customs Enforcement. At a more recent debate, she clashed with Little on a state ballot initiative to expand Medicaid, which Little has yet to say he supports.

Her position on expansion, as well as on universal health care—she’s highlighted the lack of health care access in rural communities—and marijuana, which she wants to legalize, has appealed her to the Democratic Party’s progressive bloc and made her a darling of the left this election cycle. And it’s paid off: She knocked out her closest primary challenger, a moderate Democrat favored to take the nomination, by nearly 20 points. But she’s not just a liberal dream. She’s a gun owner and proponent of Second Amendment rights. And she told me her campaign has purposefully stayed away from Trump-bashing rhetoric—deciding not to dwell on the president’s derogatory comments about Native Americans and his insistence on calling Sen. Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas”—in favor of more focus on local issues, like hunting and fishing regulations.

The result is a populist campaign that’s garnered remarkable support of independents in the state, as well as some conservatives. She snagged endorsements from organizations like Indivisible, Our Revolution, and the People for Bernie Sanders, and celebrities like Cher have tweeted their support. And in a HuffPost piece published this month, a conservative evangelical pastor who had hosted an event for Jordan’s campaign raved about her “honesty and character and authenticity,” echoing a sentiment shared by many voters in the story. 

Although it’s hard to say how much non-Democratic support Jordan is getting, since the polls don’t show party line divides among candidates, Jaclyn Kettler, a political scientist at Boise State University, told Mother Jones that Jordan’s support base is defined partly by independents and first-time or undecided voters. 

“It will be really interesting to see if Jordan can pick up some votes across the aisle,” Kettler said. “That progressive populist spirit [she has], especially ideas for working Americans who are struggling, those messages are really appealing to a lot of voters in states like Idaho. I just don’t know if it’s enough.”

At the core of her campaign, though, are rural issues, and in particular the public land that covers 60 percent of the state. For years, there’s been a push—partly led by billionaires like Dan and Farris Wilks, Texas fracking executives who bought 172,000 acres of Idaho land for private use in 2016—for the federal government to transfer Idaho’s public lands to the state, leaving them in jeopardy and at risk of privatization. Jordan’s upbringing on the reservation and the tribe’s reverence for the land makes the issue personal as well. “I’m just connected to the land in so many ways,” she said. “I think it’s important to share my heritage so that people understand this is not a political ploy. This is my actual way of life. This is the way I would like to see my heritage preserved.”

Native Americans are woefully underrepresented in DC. There are only two Native American members of Congress, making them only 0.4 percent of the Legislature. (Native Americans make up about 2 percent of the population overall.) But 2018 has seen a record number of Native American candidates run for local, state, and federal offices. More than 70 Native Americans are vying for state legislature seats (five Native Hawaiians are also running for statehouse spots), and nine are seeking election to Congress, including Deb Haaland, a New Mexican Democrat who’s likely to become the first Native American woman in the Capitol in November. And Jordan is not alone in her gubernatorial aspirations: A Native American man and a Native Hawaiian woman are running for governor in Oklahoma and Hawaii, respectively. Four Native Americans are running for lieutenant governor. In Minnesota, two Native Americans are competing for the post, guaranteeing Native Americans will be represented in that office. 

Engagement from Native Americans could be the key to Jordan’s success, since Native Americans overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. But they have a very low turnout rate compared with other groups. That’s due in part to restrictive voting laws in some states that require voters to have a street address, effectively excluding the many Native Americans living on reservations who use P.O. boxes because the US Postal Service doesn’t deliver to some reservation homes. Just this month, the US Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that requires North Dakotans to provide proof of residence to vote, potentially disenfranchising thousands of Native American voters in the state. For her part, Jordan told me she’s not taking these issues lightly, and her campaign is hosting town halls on the reservation and arranging for transportation to the polls. “It’s important for us to stand up for these voters,” she said. “[Native American voters] know there’s a major opportunity for us to make history.”

Despite her growing popularity, her campaign remains a long shot. The most recent polling indicates that her opponent, Lt. Gov. Little, has a comfortable 12-point lead, unsurprising results in a state that Trump won by more than 30 points in 2016. And despite the “blue wave” that has prevailed in some similarly red states, like in Conor Lamb’s special-election upset in Pennsylvania, Jordan is up against a well-known moderate, albeit one who only prevailed in his primary by 4 points. Little, who is almost three decades Jordan’s senior, is seen by some as boring compared with his competitor. “She’s more of an inspirational, visionary type,” one expert said in the HuffPost story. “He’s more of a kind of policy wonk, technocrat type.”

But Jordan’s campaign, the first time a Native American woman has run for the seat in the state’s history, will have lasting effects regardless of whether she wins the governor’s seat. Mark Trahant, editor of Indian Country Today and a member of Idaho’s Shoshone-Bannock tribe, compiles data on federal and state Native American candidates each election cycle. Trahant told Mother Jones that although he thinks Jordan has a “fighting chance,” the symbolic impact of her campaign can’t be understated. “When she goes into a Native community, you see all these little girls getting pictures [with her],” he said. “Changing minds about what’s possible in a whole generation, that’s the most profound thing.” Jordan concurred, saying, “It’s critical for [young people] to see someone who looks like them, who is able to lead. They can see that this is another option for them.”

And some Democrat operatives have noted that Jordan’s focus on rural issues could be a lesson for other progressive candidates trying to make headway in Trump country. “Her running the way she has, in defense of rural Idaho and defending it against the elites in Washington, has been a message that could prove very successful,” Joe Trippi, a veteran Democratic strategist, told CNN in an August profile of Jordan. 

No matter what happens come November, Jordan is acutely aware of the power of her campaign. Yes, she’s changing politics in Idaho, she said—but she also hopes to set the groundwork for those who have been locked out of government for too long. 

“There’s a younger generation out there who want to see themselves reflected in the Statehouse,” she said. “We’re listening, and we’re there for them.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate