The NRA’s Annual Meeting Has Descended Into Infighting and Chaos

Oliver North, the gun group’s president, has been forced to resign.

Michael Conroy/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After spending the last two days leveling allegations of financial impropriety against one another, both the CEO and the President of National Rifle Association are facing uncertain futures for their posts helming the nation’s most powerful gun rights group. Oliver North announced on Saturday that he had been forced to step down as the group’s president after the NRA board prevented him from seeking a second term as president, marking his resignation after more than two decades serving on the NRA’s board. Meanwhile, CEO and Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre faced a vote by members to remove him from the leadership job he’s held since 1991. (The vote failed.)

That internal chaos has been aired out in full public view during the NRA’s annual meeting in Indianapolis over the last few days, as the organization has struggled in recent months, facing financial problems, threats to its nonprofit status, calls from congressional Democrats for a federal investigation of its role in political advertising, and growing federal scrutiny of the NRA’s ties to Kremlin-linked Russian operatives, the Trump campaign, and possible campaign finance violations, spread across five different congressional probes and the FBI.

The turmoil ramped up Thursday afternoon, when LaPierre sent a letter to the NRA board, obtained by the Wall Street Journal, alleging that North has been trying to extort him into resigning his NRA post. The letter claimed that North—best known for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal—had threatened to go public with accusations of over-the-top spending by LaPierre on his wardrobe and by staff on travel expenses, of sexual harassment allegations against a staffer, and damaging information related to the NRA’s nonprofit status. One member of the board told the Wall Street Journal that LaPierre’s letter was an “angry reaction” to a previous letter from North, alleging $200,000 in wardrobe expenses by LaPierre.  

On Friday, President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence both spoke at the NRA’s annual meeting, lauding the group’s work to protect Second Amendment rights. By Saturday morning, the focus had returned to the internal battle among NRA leadership. As members gathered to observe the meeting, the stage was set up with seats and placards for NRA leadership, including North and LaPierre.

But North did not show up to the meeting. Instead, an NRA board member read a letter aloud from North. It pointed to his allegations against LaPierre, as well as articles in the New York Times, New Yorker, and Wall Street Journal that have detailed allegations of financial mismanagement by senior NRA officials. “There is a clear crisis that needs to be dealt with quickly and responsibly,” North wrote in his letter, adding that the accusations, if proven true, would threaten the NRA’s nonprofit status. 

The ricocheting allegations between the NRA’s top leaders are centered in part on an ongoing dispute between the NRA and its advertising firm, Ackerman McQueen. The ad firm hired North last year to host a documentary program on NRATV; this month, the NRA sued Ackerman McQueen over a billing dispute. LaPierre alleged in his Thursday letter that North’s threats to him were in fact at the behest of his employer, Ackerman McQueen, suggesting that North is complicit in the ad firm’s retaliation against the NRA for their suit. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate