Senate Democrats Urge FBI to Assess Security at Mar-a-Lago

A Chinese national allegedly carrying malware gained access to Trump’s resort on Saturday.

Mar-a-Lago on April 3, 2019Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Three senior Senate Democrats want the FBI to evaluate the national security risks posed by vulnerabilities at Mar-a-Lago in the wake of the recent arrest there of a Chinese national, Yujing Zhang. Zhang had allegedly gained entry to Donald Trump’s private resort while carrying electronics that included a thumb drive containing malware. Trump and members of his family were visiting Mar-a-Lago during the weekend when the incident occurred.

“This latest incident raises very serious questions regarding security vulnerabilities at Mar-a-Lago, which foreign intelligence services have reportedly targeted,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.), and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote in a letter Wednesday to FBI Director Christopher Wray. “The apparent ease with which Ms. Zhang gained access to the facility during the Presidentā€™s weekend visit raises concerns about the system for screening visitors, including the reliance on determinations made by Mar-a-Lago employees.”

The senators requested that the FBI, “in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, assess the risks at Mar-a-Lago” resulting from Trump’s decision to install facilities and equipment to access classified information while vacationing there. They also urged the FBI to work with the Secret Service to determine “steps needed to detect and deter adversary governments or their agents from attempting to gain access to or conduct electronic surveillance or acquire material at Mar-a-Lago or President Trumpā€™s other properties.”

Trump has brushed off complaints that his decision to continue to visit and profit from Mar-a-Lago, where he is known to mingle with guests who receive limited vetting, creates a massive opportunity for foreign spies and a major conflict of interest, since guests seeking to influence his policy decisions can pay lavish membership or event fees to visit the property.

On Monday, federal prosecutors in Florida charged Zhang with unlawfully entering a restricted area at Mar-a-Lago on March 30. They also charged her with making false statements to federal agents about her presence at the club. According to an affidavit filed by a Secret Service agent, Zhang arrived at the club, showed a security officer two Chinese passports, and claimed she was there to visit the pool. Believing she was a relative of a Mar-a-Lago member, club personnel admitted her. Once she was inside, Zhangā€™s story apparently changed. She told a receptionist she had come to the club for an event held by the ā€œUnited Nations Chinese American Association.ā€ No such event was scheduled, and the receptionist summoned Secret Service agents.

Zhang was detained and transported to a Secret Service facility, where she ā€œclaimed her Chinese friend ā€˜Charlesā€™ told her to travel from Shanghai, China to Palm Beach, Florida, to attend this event and attempt to speak with a member of the Presidentā€™s family about Chinese and American foreign economic relations.” As Zhang was questioned, according to this filing, the Secret Service found the four cellphones, the computer, an ā€œexternal hard drive type device,ā€ and the thumb drive containing malware.

Zhangā€™s attempt to enter Mar-a-Lago coincided with an event scheduled for that night that had been promoted by Cindy Yang, the Chinese American massage parlor entrepreneur who ran a company called GY US Investments that claimed to be able to provide opportunities to ā€œinteractā€ with ā€œthe president, the [American] Minister of Commerce and other political figures.ā€ The featured speaker at this event, which the website called the ā€œInternational Leaders Elite Forum,ā€ was Elizabeth Trump Grau, the president’s sister.

According to the Miami Herald, a ā€œSafari Nightā€ event, headlined by Trump Grau, was supposed to take place at Mar-a-Lago that same evening but was canceled after media reports about Yang and her activities. Itā€™s unclear whether the ā€œSafari Nightā€ and the ā€œInternational Leadersā€ forum were the same event, but the Miami Herald has reported that Yang has repackaged existing Mar-a-Lago functions to appeal to a Chinese audience. The Herald reported that Charles Lee, the founder of a group called the United Nations Chinese Friendship Association, had bundled Yangā€™s 2018 Safari Night invitation into an eight-day ā€œbusiness travel diplomacy packageā€ that cost $13,000 and included visits to the United Nations, Congress, and Mar-a-Lago.

The Democratic senators cited Yang in their letter Wednesday, noting that the FBI has not responded to a March 15 letter from congressional Democrats asking Wray to launch “criminal and counterintelligence investigations into credible allegations of potential human trafficking, as well as unlawful foreign lobbying, campaign finance and other activities by Ms. Yang.” The Miami Herald reported Wednesday that the FBI is leading a federal investigation into possible Chinese intelligence operations targeting Trump and Mar-a-Lago. The report says the probe launched before news of Yang’s and Zhang’s activities had broken, but that investigators have since focused on the two women.

In a statement issued Wednesday, Evan Turk, an attorney representing Yang, said his client does not know Zhang. Turk also disputed reports tying Yang to Lee. “The Dr. Lee that has been mentioned in several articles was pictured with our client twice,” Turk added. “Beyond that, she states that she has no relationship with him. They were guests at the same event. Thatā€™s all. It seems that a lot of the media reports are recklessly inferring a relationship that simply does not exist.ā€

Update: The Secret Service will brief the leaders of the House Oversight Committee on Thursday morning about the security breach at Mar-a-Lago, that committee’s chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), told the Washington Post. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) also wrote to Wray on Wednesday. “The incident with Ms. Zhang raises grave counterintelligence and other concerns,” Schiff wrote. He asked Wray to respond to Democrats’ March 15 letter and address questions about security at Mar-a-Lago. The questions include what steps the Trump Organization is taking to prevent the collection of classified information at the club. “How do the imperatives of protecting that information conflict with revenue raising goals of the private club?” Schiff asks.

Read Senate Democrats’ letter:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate