The Trump Era Used to Be Defined by Large Scale Marches. How Come No One Showed up Wednesday?

What if there was a Constitutional crisis and no one came?

Carol Guzy/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Across the country Tuesday night, thousands of people rallied in support of impeaching President Donald Trump. In San Francisco, hundreds of people showed up at Federal Plaza with picket signs and chants. In New York, more than a thousand people gathered in Times Square in the rain and cold to make their voices heard. A couple hundred people even reportedly showed up to a park in Charlotte, North Carolina, reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and singing “America the Beautiful.”

But on Wednesday morning—the day the House of Representatives, for only the third time in United States history, was set to formally impeach a sitting president—it was business as usual in Washington, DC. By 9 a.m., the grounds of the US Capitol were quiet and calm with the only sliver of excitement taking place in a park situated on the Senate side of the building. There, a few hundred people were huddled under the shadow of the Capitol’s dome as speakers associated with MoveOn.org and Indivisible—two progressive advocacy groups that were the main organizer’s of this week’s nationwide protests—spoke about the importance of the impeachment process. 

It wasn’t that people weren’t excited—those in attendance, most of whom were clutching bold and clever pro-impeachment picket signs, absolutely were—but that the turnout wasn’t exactly what I expected for a demonstration on the morning of one of the the most important days in modern US history.

Three years in, the Trump presidency has provided plenty of opportunity for people living in the District to get a front-row view of Democracy in action. For the first year he was in office, it felt like a day didn’t go by where people weren’t taking to the streets in opposition to something Trump said or did. There was the historic Women’s March, of course, which kicked off a new era of activism in DC. But there were also large-scale protests in DC after Trump signed his controversial travel ban. And the March for Science, with nearly 100,000 participants on Earth Day in 2017 to push back against Trump’s denial of climate change. The March for Racial Justice that same year, which drew thousands to the National Mall to demand racial equity and justice. And dozens more demonstrations that attracted crowds of thousands throughout the streets of DC.

“What’s appealing about protests and why they’ve been such a staple of this administration is that they’re an incredibly accessible way to be involved in politics,” Elyssa Feder, the executive director of Rising Organizers, a coalition that trains organizers and activists for progressive movements, told me when I spoke to her the evening before the impeachment vote.

But in recent months, the sentiment feels more like “Trump did ______, why aren’t we in the streets?” 

There’s no easy answer to that question, but Feder thinks a lot of it has to do with “issue fatigue”—the reality that a lot of people wore themselves out physically and mentally taking to the streets in the beginning of the Trump’s presidency. “It has been one of the facets of this administration to really exhaust people,” she tells me. “And that is something I don’t think anyone has a fix for, to be totally honest.” That might be why protests in DC have waned in recent months: After four months of impeachment talk, people are exhausted. When Trump passed his first Muslim ban, Feder recalls her organization’s training before the airport protests filled up to capacity in hours, with nearly 2,000 people attending. By the third Muslim ban, and subsequent protest, about 50 people showed to her training, she recalls.

“If we keep organizing and talking to our neighbors and taking action and talking about our democracy, and if we hold this line, at this moment in our history, then we can restore a government that is worthy of all Americans,” said Will Goodwin, the director of government relations at the progressive group VoteVets, at the pro-impeachment rally outside the Capitol. His comments, like most of those who spoke on Wednesday morning, were met with a slightly less-than thunderous applause.

Just beyond the small stage where Goodwin spoke, a street vendor set up shop to sell a host of pro-impeachment buttons. “Impeach. Indict. Imprison.” one of them read. Another had the Looney Tunes logo with Trump’s head in place of Porky Pig’s. One woman asked how much he was selling them for, but wandered away before she could get an answer.

Behind the vendor, a man dressed in a full Santa costume stood solemnly with a sign showing “Santa’s Naughty List,” which, of course, includes Trump, along with several other GOP members caught up in the impeachment scandal, like Vice President Mike Pence and Devin Nunes, the House intelligence committee’s ranking member. “I do not think that we have enough real Americans in the Senate to do the right thing,” Santa, whose real name is Daniel, told me when I asked him if he thinks Trump’s impeachment will result in his removal from office. “I think it’s motivating his base, unfortunately, but it’s necessary, I think, to shine a light in the dark places on all the corruption that’s been here,” he added.

By 10 a.m., the impeachment rally was in full swing when Adam Browning, a teacher at the Washington Leadership Academy charter school in DC, showed up with his class of students, some donning signs saying “IMPEACH” and “#RESIST.” As part of a seminar on politics he’s teaching, his students are currently learning about the impeachment process and, as such, advocated to come to the demonstration. “We like to use what’s happening in our backyard as our classroom,” he told me. 

But less than an hour later, the hundreds of people rallying in front of the Capitol had whittled down to only a couple dozen. “Good protests are the result of good organizing, and this wouldn’t be happening without the dedicated organizers and networks that have been building over the last two years,” Feder told me. “Protests are an inflection point; they’re not the point.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate