The Acting Secretary of the Navy Just Resigned

Who’s “stupid” now?

Thomas Modly, acting secretary of the Navy, resigned Tuesday after harshly criticizing an aircraft carrier captain who he had fired the previous week.Chip Somodevilla/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Thomas Modly, the acting secretary of the Navy, resigned on Tuesday, one day after he called the former captain of an aircraft carrier “stupid” for drawing attention to the coronavirus crisis on his ship. The remarks, which included a profanity-laden defense of Modly’s decision to fire the captain, Brett Crozier, were widely criticized and led him to apologize hours later.

The ensuing crisis put a spotlight on Modly’s leadership at a time when the Navy is facing one of its most severe peacetime threats in its history. 

On Tuesday morning, Modly met with Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and submitted his resignation. Esper later confirmed the resignation in a letter and announced that James McPherson, the undersecretary of the Army, will replace Modly. The Navy will now have another temporary civilian leader, its fourth in less than a year. 

Modly’s downfall began last week when Brett Crozier, captain of the USS Roosevelt, wrote a letter describing in unsparing detail the spread of the virus among his crew members. “We are not at war,” he wrote. “Sailors do not need to die.” The San Francisco Chronicle published a leaked copy of the letter and Modly relieved Crozier of his command, saying he “undermined the chain of command” by sending the letter to a wide range of people, which increased the chances of it leaking. By the time Crozier sent his letter, more than 100 crew members had been infected with COVID-19. Crozier himself later tested positive for the disease.  

In the days following Crozier’s ouster, Modly struggled to defend his decision to fire the popular leader given his otherwise sterling track record and support among the crew. At an April 2 press conference, Modly said Crozier “was absolutely correct” in raising concerns about the Navy’s response, but erred in broadly sending a letter without consulting his immediate superior first.

But in making a decision so quickly without completing an investigation into the leak, Modly revealed there were other concerns on his mind, particularly the views of President Trump. In November, Trump clashed with Navy leaders over his support of disgraced Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher, a dispute that ultimately led to former Navy Secretary Richard Spencer’s departure and Modly’s elevation. When asked about Crozier’s letter over the weekend, Trump said, “I thought it was terrible what he did, to write a letter. This isn’t a class on literature. This is a captain of a massive ship that’s nuclear-powered.” Trump and Modly have insisted that the White House played no direct role in Crozier’s firing, but it was obvious where the president stood. 

In an interview with the Washington Post‘s David Ignatius on Sunday, Modly admitted that Trump had been on his mind when he fired Crozier. “If I were president, and I saw a commanding officer of a ship exercising such poor judgment, I would be asking why the leadership of the Navy wasn’t taking action itself,” he said. 

On April 5, Modly provided his own example of poor judgment. He traveled to Guam, where the Roosevelt is currently stationed, and gave a profanity-laden speech to the crew where he said Crozier was either “too naive or too stupid” to hold a command if he believed his letter would not be leaked. The audio of Modly’s own speech later leaked and top Democrats, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, called on him to step down. His fate was sealed the next day. 

This story has been updated.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate