Donald Trump Can’t Denounce White Supremacists Because He Is One

He showed us again last night.

Trump racist

Yuri/Abaca via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Wednesdayā€”one day after the debate in which he refused to condemn white supremacists and told a neofascist street gang to ā€œstand byā€ā€”President Donald Trump reprised his bigotry at a campaign stop in Duluth, Minnesota. There, in front of a few thousand supporters at an airport, he attacked the stateā€™s Somali American community and accused former Vice President Joe Biden of wanting to turn Minnesota into a ā€œrefugee camp.ā€

Trump warned his supporters that Biden had a ā€œplan to inundate your state with a historic flood of refugees.ā€ Those refugees, he added, would be ā€œcoming from the most dangerous places in the world, including Yemen, Syria, and your favorite country: Somalia. Right? You love Somalia.ā€

At this point, Trump pointed at a man in the crowd. ā€œThis guy loves Somalia,ā€ he said, as the crowd booed. ā€œBiden will turn Minnesota into a refugee campā€”and he said that! Overwhelming public resources, overcrowding schools, and inundating your hospitals.ā€

It was not the first time Trump had attacked Somali refugees in Minnesota. Although the state has a long and proud history of welcoming refugees, Trump has very explicitly tried to exploit racist anger about non-white immigrant communities. During the 2016 campaign, Trump told voters in Minnesota that they had ā€œsufferedā€ from the ā€œlarge numbers of Somali refugees coming into your state.ā€ In 2017, Trump signed a watered-down version of his promised ā€œMuslim banā€ that virtually blocked Somalis from coming to the United States. Since then, he has repeatedly erased the US citizenship of Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omarā€”a Somali refugee. Trump has called Omar an ā€œAmerica-hating socialistā€ who should ā€œgo backā€ to the country she fled as a child.

ā€œSheā€™s telling us how to run our country,ā€ he said last week in Pennsylvania. ā€œHow did you do where you came from? Howā€™s your country doing?ā€

ā€œAnd then she tells us how to run our country, can you believe it?ā€ Trump said again on Wednesday, as the crowd chanted, ā€œLock her up.ā€

It’s an attack that specifically classifies some people as true Minnesotans and Americans and others as lesser ones, whose right to be here is a privilege that can simply be revoked. When Trump viciously attacked Omar during a North Carolina campaign stop last year, his supporters chanted, “Send her back, send her back.ā€ These not-at-all-coded racist barrages against people of Somali descent are not confined to Minnesota, either; the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., warned in 2018 that Somalis would ā€œrepopulateā€ Maine unless voters supported a Republican for US Senate.

None of this is new, and thatā€™s the point. Tuesdayā€™s debate set off another round of tut-tutting from members of the press and political world about the presidentā€™s reluctance to condemn white supremacists. He blustered his way through another non-answer about the Proud Boys on Wednesday, before catching a flight to his Minnesota rally. On Thursday, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany talked around a question about the president’s views toward these bigots.

ā€œThis all remains very puzzling,ā€ an angry John Roberts of Fox News said on air a few minutes later. ā€œStop deflecting, stop blaming the media. Iā€™m tired of it.ā€

With all respect to Roberts, a far more credible journalist than many of the people at his network, it is not very puzzling. Trump makes his views on white supremacy crystal clear every time he holds a rallyā€”every time he tells a Muslim, Somali-American congresswoman to ā€œgo backā€; every time he says that ā€œour countryā€ is not also hers; every time he tells white Minnesotans that refugees from Africa are dangerous and a threat to their way of life. He made his views clear when he said that some white supremacists are ā€œvery fine peopleā€; or that neo-fascists should ā€œstand byā€; or that a judge born in Indiana is biased because of his ā€œMexican heritageā€; or that people coming across the border are ā€œrapistsā€; and so onā€¦) 

The president doesnā€™t condemn these bigots because he is one. This whole exercise of asking him to condemn something and then wondering why he doesnā€™t is not simply pointlessā€”it’s an active refusal to accept the facts as theyā€™ve been laid out. He told you who he is; for once, you can take him at his word.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate