Yes, Let’s Mandate Vaccines for Eligible School Children, Fauci Says

Requiring shots for deadly diseases is “nothing new”—and it will save lives.

A healthcare worker administers a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine to a student during a "Vax To School" campaign event at a high school on Staten Island, New York. Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

A week and a half ago, a small public school district in western Los Angeles became what is believed to be the first district in the country to mandate COVID vaccines for any student eligible to get them. Culver City Unified sent letters to families of its 7,100 students advising that all eligible staff and students would have to show proof of vaccination by mid-November

Some states, such as California and New Jersey, already require that teachers and school staff get vaccinated for COVID or else face weekly testing. Oregon, Washington, and New York City have gone further, requiring the vaccine outright. But no state, so far, has required vaccines for students 12 and older, who are eligible for the shots.
 
On Sunday morning, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s top infectious disease expert, said he believed vaccine mandates for children were a “good idea”—not just for those students, but also for younger kids once federal authorities approve it. “I know that a lot of people will be pushing back against that,” he told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Face the Nation Sunday.
 
Fauci said he believes the FDA and the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will confirm the safety and the “strong risk-benefit ratio” of the vaccine for children. “When that gets established, which I believe it certainly will” he said, “I believe that mandating vaccines for children to appear in school is a good idea.”
 
“This is not something new,” he added. “We have mandates in many places in schools, particularly public schools, that if in fact you want a child to come in, we’ve done this for decades and decades—requiring polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis [vaccines].”

Children have been accounting for a larger share of COVID cases nationwide as the Delta variant—deemed roughly as transmissible as chicken pox—has swept the country in a devastating fourth wave of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. Although children generally experience less severe symptoms than adults, and make up less than 2 percent of COVID-related hospital admissions, pediatric COVID hospitalizations surged this week to the highest on record, an average of 303 admitted per day. 

The Delta wave, coinciding with back-to-school season, has fueled justified fears of classroom infections. In Marin County, California, one unvaccinated elementary school teacher who attributed her fatigue and sniffles to allergies removed her mask to read a book aloud to students. Two days later, she tested positive. Subsequent testing revealed that half of her class—mostly kids sitting near the front—were infected, along with six students in another grade, and eight guardians and siblings, according to a CDC case study published on Friday. 

According to an influential COVID forecasting model from the University of Washington, an additional 98,000 people in the United States are projected to die from COVID by early December—though the number, health experts told the Associated Press, could be cut in half if everyone wears a mask in public spaces.

On Sunday, Fauci pointed out that 80 million people in the United States are eligible to receive the vaccine still haven’t gotten it. To boost the uptake numbers, Fauci encourages mandates for colleges and businesses with large numbers of employees. “What is going on now is both entirely predictable but entirely preventable,” he said, and mandates are “one of the ways that we can get many, many more people vaccinated.”

Watch Fauci’s interview here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate