FDA Panel Decision on COVID Boosters “Not the End of the Story,” Fauci Says

Nor was it a mistake, he insists. And the process is far from over.

Pool/Getty Images News

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Friday, an independent advisory panel for the Food and Drug Administration voted against recommending a Pfizer booster shot for the general public. It did, however, vote to recommend that those 65 and older and at risk of severe disease be eligible for a third dose of the COVID vaccine.

Top health official Dr. Anthony Fauci, a proponent of the wide use of boosters, responded to the decision on Sunday, saying it “is not the end of the story.”  

“I don’t think they made a mistake,” Fauci told CNN’s Jake Tapper on State of the Union, “but the one thing I think people need to realize: That data are coming in, literally on a daily and weekly basis…They’re going to continue to look at this literally in real-time.” 

In recent days, the media has framed the panel’s recommendation, which is non-binding, as a “blow” and “stinging setback” for the Biden administration, which had proposed booster shots beginning as early as September 20 as part of its pandemic response plan. But Fauci emphasized Sunday that approval from the FDA was always baked into the proposal. 

“It was always pending the evaluation of all of the totality of the data from the United States, from Israel, and any bit of data that we could get by the advisory committee to the FDA,” he said. “They did that in the proper deliberative process and they came up with a recommendation which I think is a good recommendation.”

When Tapper reminded Fauci that only days before he’d said a panel decision against boosters would be “a mistake,” Fauci pushed back: “That’s the reason why we have qualified groups of people who together as a committee examine all the data and make a decision…Data will continue to come in, and I believe you are gonna see an evolution of this process.” (It’s worth noting that, as my colleague Lil Kalish reports, many experts have cautioned against the rush to dole out boosters when so many people in low-income countries have yet to receive a first dose. Fauci has argued that America can—and is—providing boosters while also supplying vaccines to other nations.)

Echoing Fauci’s stance, National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins told Fox News Sunday that he expects the FDA to approve boosters for those under 65 in the coming weeks. “I think the big news is that they actually did approve the initiation of boosters, and, remember, they’re taking a snapshot of right now…It would surprise me if it does not become clear over the next few weeks that administration of boosters may need to be enlarged.”

“What you’re seeing here is science playing out in a very transparent way,” he said. “This is the way it ought to be.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate