What the Hell Is Going on With Eligibility for COVID-19 Boosters?

Inconsistent messaging around who should receive another shot could sow further distrust in public health officials.

Biden booster

Evan Vucci/AP

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

For most people, the issue of COVID-19 boosters essentially boils down to “Should I get one or not?” But due to muddled messaging from federal agencies, it’s been difficult to get a direct answer to that seemingly straightforward question. 

The evidence is clear that even without boosters, the COVID-19 vaccines are still highly effective at preventing hospitalization and death—the mortality risk for an unvaccinated person is 10 times higher than for a vaccinated person. But some studies have shown that their protection against infection has started to wane, and some experts worry about a potential surge in cases as the weather cools and people begin to huddle indoors. Experts believe boosters will help address these concerns.

It’s likely that some of the confusion around boosters will clear up if and when they become widely available. The New York Times reported Tuesday night that the FDA is aiming to authorize Pfizer boosters for all adults this week without consulting its expert panel, which recommended against boosters for all individuals under 65 in a September vote. 

But up until this point, people trying to determine their third-dose eligibility have had to sort through a blizzard of developments and contradictory rulings. (Buckle up. It’s about to get complicated.) On September 17, the Food and Drug Administration’s advisory panel voted against Pfizer’s request to authorize boosters for all people 18 and older, instead recommending them only for high-risk individuals, those above 65, and those who work in jobs or live in institutions where they’re likely to get exposed to the coronavirus. A week later, a different panel advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partially disagreed with the FDA panel’s decision, saying that a high-risk job shouldn’t qualify people for a booster. And then in a decision issued around midnight, CDC director Rochelle Walensky overruled the CDC panel, bringing the CDC’s guidelines in step with the FDA’s. The CDC also recommends that all people two months past a single Johnson & Johnson dose receive a booster shot. And those who fall under the eligible categories are free to mix and match vaccines. 

Meanwhile Colorado, California, New Mexico, and New York City barreled past current federal guidelines, allowing people 18 and up to get boosters, provided that they are six months past the second dose of an mRNA vaccine (that is, Pfizer or Moderna), or two months past a single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. Some of these jurisdictions justified the move by declaring large geographic regions—entire states or cities—to be high-risk “institutions,” thereby making all people who live within their borders eligible for a booster. 

If you’re anything like me, your head is probably throbbing at this point. And that’s not a great place to be while contemplating a decision about your health. 

Infectious disease epidemiologist Jessica Malaty Rivera said that the inconsistent messaging around boosters could further worsen distrust in public health officials. “When the messages don’t line up from this body to that body, from this official to that official, it creates distrust,” she said. “It makes people go rogue on their own risk assessments.”

Some experts have gone even further. Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, called the messaging over booster shots “one of the biggest missed opportunities in this pandemic” in an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation. “Anyone who’s eligible for a booster, and most Americans probably are eligible for a booster at this point, should be going out and seeking it,” he said. 

In practice, however, it might not be so complicated. Since most vaccine providers ask people to self-attest to their eligibility, third doses are widely available around the United States, even to those who may not technically meet the FDA and CDC requirements. FDA authorization for a Pfizer booster would bring federal recommendations in line with what, in many cases, is already happening on the ground. 

The CDC’s interim clinical considerations regarding booster shots are also currently broad enough that most people could reasonably claim to meet them, said L.J. Tan, chief strategy officer for the Immunization Action Coalition, a vaccine information organization that works with the CDC. Tan pointed to one provision in the document that cites “an inability to work or meet other personal obligations when infected, even if not severely ill with COVID-19,” as a reason for considering a booster dose.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate