Republicans Spent Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Hearing Obsessing Over a White Man

The specter of Brett Kavanaugh’s hearings loomed large.

Ron Sachs/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Tuning into the first day of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s historic confirmation hearings, one name loomed large, at least for Republican senators: Brett Kavanaugh. 

Yes, lingering complaints about the 2018 hearings for Donald Trump’s second Supreme Court nominee appeared front and center. Kavanaugh, who survived a tumultuous confirmation hearing despite allegations of sexual assault, was repeatedly mentioned in Monday’s opening remarks, as Republicans insisted that Jackson’s time before the Senate Judiciary Committee would not devolve into the supposed “political circus” that had embattled Kavanaugh’s hearings. The hearing was punctuated by backhanded scoring settling.

“We’re off to a good start,” ranking member Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley said at the outset. “Unlike the start to the Kavanaugh hearings, we didn’t have repeated choreographed interruptions.” 

Democrats interrupted me for more than an hour during my opening statement on the Kavanaugh hearings,” he continued.

Perhaps the absence of disruptions stemmed from the fact that President Biden’s pick for the Supreme Court has never been accused of sexual assault. Omitting this critical distinction, Republican senators appeared to fume at the very memory of Kavanaugh’s treatment.

“Most of us couldn’t go back to our offices during Kavanaugh without getting spit on,” Sen. Lindsey Graham claimed during his turn to broach the 2018 hearings.

Ted Cruz went one step further, minimizing the allegations against Kavanaugh as baseless scrutiny of his “teenage dating habits.” “No one is going to ask you, with mock severity, ‘Do you like beer?'” the Texas senator assured.

“Engaging in the politics of personal destruction is not something we should ever aspire to,” Sen. Mike Lee continued, attempting to draw a contrast with his Democratic colleagues. “It is something that has occurred on this committee in the context of Supreme Court nominations. I’m pleased to say that it has never been under Republican leadership that such attacks have occurred.”

Republicans also suggested that they’d resist attacking Jackson with the same character smears they believed Democrats unfairly mounted against Kavanaugh. But those gestures at morality were quickly undermined by Republicans, including Graham and Josh Hawley, who signaled that they were willing to go after Jackson with wildly misleading attacks suggesting that as a judge, she had a record of going soft on child pornographers. As my colleague Stephanie Mencimer wrote, that absurd line of attack just emphasizes how little Republicans have to go on in opposing Jackson’s historic nomination.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate