March 10, 2023

Some Takeaways From The Most Boring Republican Probably Running for President

Glenn Youngkin appears on CNN with his trademark canned responses and non-answers.

John C. Clark/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin appeared on CNN for an education-themed town hall with Jake Tapper, where concerned citizens directly asked the Republican, a likely contender for the party’s presidential nomination, questions on everything from the state’s gun laws to artificial intelligence in classrooms. In typical Youngkin fashion, he tap danced around most of the issues.

I sorted through the canned responses and non-answers. Here are the key takeaways: 

Youngkin Is Happy With His Review of Virginia’s AP African-American Studies Course

Youngkin defended his first executive order banning critical race theory and other subjects deemed inherently divisive. Youngkin, one of the key players spearheading the ongoing Republican war against CRT, claimed during Thursday’s town hall that he isn’t against history being taught accurately in schools. But schools, according to Youngkin, should be prohibited from teaching “that a child is guilty for sins of the past because of their race or religion or their sex.” (CRT does not do that.) 

The question follows Youngkin’s order for a review of Virginia’s pilot AP African-American studies program, a clear effort to replicate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. During his CNN appearance, Youngkin doubled down on that decision. 

Youngkin Wanted to Sign Book Removals Into Law

The governor confirmed that if a recently killed bill to ban books had come across his desk, he would’ve happily signed it. The bill, HB 1448, sought to mandate new policies around the selection and removal of books inside school libraries. The legislation, which passed the state’s GOP-majority House, was later defeated by Virginia’s Democratic-majority Senate.

“Had that bill passed, I would have signed it,” Youngkin said on Thursday. “And then we would have engaged with communities, not in a strong-handed way, but in an engaged way, to listen and discuss and make good decisions for our kids.”

Youngkin Stands Behind His Rollback on Transgender Students’ Rights

When a 17-year-old transgender student asked about the governor’s removal of trans protections, and specifically whether Youngkin wanted him, a transgender man, to use a woman’s bathroom, Youngkin said that the answer was simply more gender-neutral bathrooms. He also defended his policy of forcing trans kids to play on sports teams based on their sex assigned at birth. 

“Sports are very clear,” Youngkin said. “I don’t think it’s controversial. I don’t think that biological boys should be playing sports with biological girls. There have been decades of efforts in order to gain opportunities for women in sports, and it’s just not fair.”

What about LGBTQ students whose parents don’t support them? Youngkin said that children “belong to their parents, not the state.”

Youngkin Defends Virginia’s Gun Laws

During the town hall, a parent of a Richneck Elementary School student, where a 6-year-old allegedly shot a teacher in January, asked Youngkin about his plans to strengthen Virginia’s gun laws. And, as per usual, Youngkin dodged the question, claiming the state must focus on mental health before asserting that Virginia already has some of the strongest gun laws in the country. 

“That storage law could use some work though,” Jake Tapper said.

“What we continue to find is that those gun laws don’t keep us safe,” Youngkin said in response to Tapper. Because it’s not laws that keep us safe. It’s the behavior of people that we need to make sure that we’re paying attention to. Parents have a responsibility to keep guns out of their young children’s hands, and they need to be held accountable for that.”

Virginia’s GOP-led House has come under fire for killing the majority of gun storage bills during its most recent legislative session.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate