Did Elon Musk Unleash Racist Dog Whistles to Woo Tucker Carlson?

As he makes his broadcast debut on the platform, the disgraced Fox host should feel right at home.

Clive Mason/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Elon Musk got on his own website on Saturday and started dog-whistle posting.

In a series of reply tweets, he highlighted for his millions of followers thinly veiled racist tweets about Black people doing crime against white people, thereby boosting them in Twitter’s algorithm. 

Then on Sunday, Axios reported that Musk had spoken with the recently fired Fox News host Tucker Carlson about potentially taking his act to Twitter. On Tuesday, Carlson confirmed that he would soon launch a version of his show on Musk’s platform. One could reasonably wonder whether these things are related. Let’s discuss:

First, consider the tweets in question. In replying to a tweet sharing a misleading graphic suggesting the media focuses nearly exclusively on white-on-Black crime, Musk wrote: “Odd, why would the media misrepresent the real situation to such an extreme degree?” (The graphic gives a supposed, and much higher, number for Black-on-white crime.) But the image has serious problems, and elides the truth. For more on that, here is Judd Legum writing in his Popular Information newsletter:

One major issue with the chart, which has been circulated online for years by racists since it first appeared in The Blaze in 2019, is that it excludes “White on White” and “Black on Black” crime. Crimes by whites against other whites are by far the most common type of crime in the United States. 

Knack, a Belgian media site, debunked the image in 2020. The outlet also created its own version of the chart, which includes crimes where the perpetrator and victim are the same race. It paints a far different picture. 

Musk also responded with “interesting” to a tweet that reads, “Blacks kill each other. Whites kill themselves.” He also replied to several tweets about cases of Black people killing white people that supposedly went ignored, but which were actually reported by local and national media.

White people harping on Black crime has long been the loudest of dog whistles. A Nixon campaign aide admitted in a 22-year-old interview, which Harper’s published in 2016, that the War on Drugs was designed to harness anti-black racial animus without doing so directly. George H.W. Bush infamously tried a similar ploy with his ads about Willie Horton, a Black prisoner released on a furlough program who raped a white woman and stabbed her boyfriend. More recently, who can forget that Breitbart News had a tab for “Black Crime”? While baldly deploying the message of “look at who is doing all of this crime” has gotten dicier, it’s still a favored tactic of contemporary white nationalists like Nick Fuentes and his friends, so Musk is in superb company. 

Musk, who has tweeted out a series of increasingly far-right, regressive things, doesn’t normally broach white nationalist territory. Which raises the question: Was his doing so related to wooing Carlson to set up shop on his struggling platform? It might not have been a bad strategy. After all, Carlson is notorious for, among other things, being a hero to white supremacists and the far right—and serving as their bridge to the mainstream. (He talks like this too: As recently as 2022, he blamed “African American males” for the spike in crime rates.) Carlson was reportedly fired after Fox board members grew alarmed about a text diatribe in which Carlson cited a video of Trump supporters beating up “an Antifa kid” and wrote: “It’s not how white men fight.” 

Maybe Musk’s misrepresentation of the race-and-crime statistics was a ham-fisted overture to Tucker to say, “I’ve got your back.” Or maybe Musk is simply racist.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate