It’s Official: Trump Will Take His First Step to Renomination on the Only Federal Holiday Honoring a Black Man

The Iowa GOP admits it did not consider it had scheduled voting on Martin Luther King Day

Trump in August 2015.Charlie Neibergall/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Republican Party of Iowa announced on Saturday that they had landed on January 15, 2024 for its first-in-the-nation presidential caucus. That happens to be Martin Luther King Jr. Day: the sole federal holiday honoring the legacy of a Black individual. 

After a chaotic caucus in 2020, in which technology glitches led to delays in reported results, the Democratic National Committee voted in 2023 to drop Iowa from its decades-long position at the top of the party’s presidential nominating contest. It wasn’t just the tech issues that caused the DNC to rethink Iowa’s position on the nominating calendar: Iowa is a predominantly white state that is not necessarily as representative of the diversity of the Democratic party—or of America—as other states that have vyed to vote early, such as South Carolina, Georgia, and Nevada.

“We are overdue in changing this primary calendar to ensure it reflects the range of ideas, thoughts and hopes of Americans throughout this country,” said Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) of the calendar shakeup at the time. 

Diversity considerations, however, were not necessarily top of mind when Iowa Republicans selected to force people to vote on the holiday honoring Martin Luther King. 

“As Republicans,” state GOP chair Jeff Kaufmann told reporters, “we see this as honoring the legacy of Martin Luther King.” He clarified that the committee had not considered the possibility of the caucus falling on MLK day before reaching their decision, according to the Associated Press.

With the start of nominating events now officially just a little more than six months away, available Iowa polls have consistently shown Trump with sometimes overwhelming leads over his 2024 challengers in the state.

It’s unclear what the GOP’s date will mean for Iowa Democrats: the calendar approved by the Democratic National Committee and endorsed by President Joe Biden calls for South Carolina to host its primary on February 3 as the party’s first nominating contest. Iowa Democrats had reportedly been considering conducting a mail-only primary on the same day Republicans, but not immediately release the results, as part of an attempt to preserve a place at the head of the line without technically defying the DNC. 

After the Republicans’ announcement Rita Hart, Iowa’s Democratic Party chair, pledged to move “forward with the most inclusive caucus process in Iowa’s history,” but offered few details. “We’re committed to doing what’s good for Democrats, what’s good for Iowa, and what’s good for democracy,” she said.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate