After the Boos, Bernie Sanders Takes a Softer Approach

The times, they are a-changin’.

Sen. Bernie Sanders in Indianola, Iowa.Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Bernie Sanders’ allies railed against the DNC and corporate Democrats out to get him, and Vampire Weekend was in Iowa to open up for the senator.

That was what I saw reporting from the state four years ago as caucus-goers faced choosing between Sanders and Hillary Clinton. And over the past 24 hours I’ve had a strong sense of déjà vu.

Friday night, while Sanders was stuck in DC as the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump entered its final days, his campaign threw a concert and rally with surrogates in the Des Moines suburb of Clive, headlined by Justin Vernon, the Midwest indie-rock icon better known as Bon Iver. (Vampire Weekend is set to play Saturday night in Cedar Rapids.) Vernon played his mournful hits, and closed with a rousing rendition of Bob Dylan’s classic “The Times They Are a-Changin’.”


But before the music, there was a heavy emphasis from his camp on recriminations against perceived slights against Sanders.

Earlier in the day, the Democratic National Committee had announced it was changing the rules governing access to an upcoming presidential debate, dropping the requirement that candidates surpass a minimum number of contributors—a move clearly designed to allow former New York City mayor, billionaire, and self-funder Michael Bloomberg to make the stage. Sanders’ campaign adviser and his 2016 campaign manager Jeff Weaver quickly blasted the shift.

At the rally in Clive, filmmaker and onetime Mother Jones editor Michael Moore took up the call—and went even further. “I have to wake up this morning and realize that we have to fight the corporate Democrats, the 1 percent of the Democratic Party who are thoroughly pissed that Bernie Sanders is now number one, that Bernie Sanders might win this primary season, that Bernie Sanders might be the next president of the United States. Oooh, they’re so upset!” 

Later in the evening, a panel of House members who have endorsed Sanders—Reps. Pramila Jayapal, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib—took the stage, subbing in for the missing senator. When the moderator made reference to Hillary Clinton, the audience let out a smattering of boos. Beyond general resentment lingering from 2016, there was fresh reason Sanders supporters would feel irked by his ex-opponent. Earlier in the day, a podcast interview came out wherein Clinton yet again ascribed some of her defeat to Trump to Sanders and his supporters. “All the way up until the end, a lot of people highly identified with his campaign were urging people to vote third party, urging people not to vote,” she said.

Clinton’s attacks on Sanders offer a staggering contrast to how she handled her 2008 campaign against Barack Obama and the aftermath of her primary defeat. Over the course of that contest, her surrogates spread photos of Obama in traditional African clothes in a clear race-baiting attack and went on TV to call him a drug user unfit for the presidency. When it was growing clear that Obama was likely to win the nomination, Clinton’s campaign picked a Hail Mary fight at the DNC’s rules committee to seat contested delegates who backed her. Then a cohort of diehard Clinton stans organized as PUMAs—standing for Party Unity, My Ass—and while Clinton expressed general disapproval, she didn’t exactly expel all of them from polite Democratic circles. While Obama and Clinton patched things up enough that she became his Secretary of State, the first fundraiser she appeared at after leaving his administration in 2014 was hosted by leading PUMA Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild.

When the boos piped up in Clive, the moderator tried to tamp down the sentiment, but Tlaib wasn’t having it. “You all know I can’t be quiet, we’re going to boo,” Tlaib said, egging on the crowd. “That’s alright. The haters will shut up on Monday when we win.”

But by the next morning, as the sun popped out over Iowa for the first time in days, Tlaib had expressed regret about her comments on Twitter. When Sanders, taking advantage of a weekend break from impeachment attendance, stumped at a rally at Simpson College in Indianola, Omar’s remarks offered only general references to attacks on Sanders. “The attacks on Bernie have become more and more desperate,” she said. While Jayapal was also there, Tlaib wasn’t, though she hadn’t been on the event’s schedule before the boos.

When Sanders himself took the mic, he went out of his way to be deferential to his opponents in a way that gently pushed back at Clinton. “Let me say this so there is no misunderstanding, and I believe I speak for all of the other Democrats competing in this primary. Certainly, I hope that we’re going to win, but if we do not win, we will support the winner and I know that every other candidate will do the same,” he said. “We are united in understanding that we must defeat Donald Trump.”

Given his newly found frontrunner status in the state, and the fact that impeachment has limited opportunities to see him in Iowa, the event was overflowing with members of the national media. After it wrapped, I spotted an old roommate of mine’s mom (both of them are from Iowa) who I knew was planning to caucus for Warren. I scurried over to get her take on Bernie, but New York Times podcaster Michael Barbaro beat me to her.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate