For Refugees Stranded at Croatian Choke Point, EU Agreement Brings Little Relief

“They’re lying, actually. Just lies. Lies, lies, lies.”

Hundreds of refugees line up at the border camp at Opatovac, Croatia.Artur Widak/NurPhoto/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Monday, a 19-year-old Syrian named Yazan was constantly on the move, racing through four European countries in less than 24 hours. On Tuesday, he sat marooned for hours in southeastern Croatia, watching a crowd of refugees try to squeeze their way into a new processing center that promised food, water, and medical checks.

“They’re saying they’ll let 20 people inside” at a time, he said. “But they’re lying, actually.” It was his eighth hour lounging in a field that had grown scorching hot, next to the center in the village of Opatovac. He’d seen refugees tussling with Croatian police that morning, and then heard promise after promise that the small groups could start coming inside the center in “just a few minutes.” He figured 40 people of the hundreds waiting might have made it in, but more likely none did. “Just lies. Lies, lies, lies.”

Yazan, who asked that his last name not be published because of safety concerns for his family in Syria, had only stuck around because his aunt was still inside. Both had walked the 15 kilometers to Opatovac from the border crossing with Serbia at Tovarnik, but Yazan slowed down to help his aunt’s son, Nasser, who struggled with an injured leg. Neither of the two young men could see her or get in contact, but Yazan planned to wait until she appeared. Then he’d get as far away as he could, walking again if he had to. “Again and again until I get out of here,” he vowed.

The police told refugees there were already 5,000 people inside the camp, part of a bottleneck that has become less common on the refugee route through the Balkans. The crisis has bred drama, confusion, and occasional violence as Syrians, Iraqis, Afghans, and others try to find ways north to friendlier countries. But large-scale incidents and unorganized migration are receding here. The route is becoming quieter and more static—if only comparatively—as individual governments try to pass the problem along to the next country rather than block the flow of migration.

Yazan and other refugees say they now board buses or trains that speed them from one border to the next. In Serbia on Monday afternoon, an assembly-line operation delivered a busload of refugees every few minutes from Macedonia to a cornfield outside the town of Šid, letting them hurry a couple of kilometers past a gauntlet of aid workers and a cemetery into Croatia. Even Hungary, which last week used tear gas and a hastily built border fence to keep out refugees, is now bringing its unwanted visitors to the border with Austria, where thousands are arriving every day. Today, Croatia is the major roadblock to a relatively smooth passage through the Balkans, the goal of almost all of the people here.

The Croatian government has wavered between welcomes and blockades. When the first refugees started arriving from Serbia last Wednesday, Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovi? said they were welcome to pass through his country. But the government planned for 20,000 refugees to come to Croatia over two weeks, a number wildly out of sync with the flow of refugees. When 13,000 showed up within just two days, Croatia tried to shut its border back down. Since then, it has sometimes let refugees walk through and at other times pushed them back, trying to relieve the pressure on the camp at Opatovac and other overcrowded facilities.

“Macedonia was simple,” said Omar Jassim Mohammed, a 26-year-old from Baghdad. “Come in, get out. Go, go, go!” But once he arrived in Croatia, he spent the night outside at the processing center in 45-degree weather, managing only 30 minutes of sleep and getting no answers from police officers as to where he might go next.

The problem has been compounded by the inaction of the European Union. EU interior ministers finally agreed on Tuesday to redistribute 120,000 refugees across its member countries, but more than 300,000 people have already applied for asylum in Europe this year, with many more having entered the continent. The plan passed over dissenting votes from Hungary, the Czech Republic, Romania, and Slovakia; the latter three will have to be forced into accepting their share of the refugees, but it’s not yet clear how that might happen.

Whatever the European Union does, it will not help Yazan and his cousin move more quickly. “He’s saying, ‘Stay away people, just for a few minutes,'” he said, listening to yet another announcement by the police. “They’re saying that since 2011.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate