I Friended a Bunch of Trump Voters. It’s Been a Fascinating Week.

“Echo chambers are dangerous.”

James West

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


I began a mini-experiment after the election: Facebook-friend every Trump voter I interviewed this year. I hope to dish up more diverse political views for our readers, and to inspire Facebook’s algorithm to deliver different news sources to my feed. I also want to keep reporting on voters’ reactions after the election—to see how their views change over time and if mine do, too.

Since I started, Facebook has weathered a storm of criticism for its role in amplifying fake news and reinforcing the isolation of our political bubbles. Zeynep Tufekci, a University of North Carolina sociologist, wrote in the New York Times last week that Facebook’s algorithm “chooses which updates appear higher up in users’ news feeds and which are buried.” The problem? “Humans already tend to cluster among like-minded people and seek news that confirms their biases.” Facebook prioritizes content that users find “comforting,” Tufekci wrote.

What is missing is that bracing, even essential discomfort of democracy—something I want injected into my feed more regularly.

My Facebook recruits are self-selecting, so clearly they don’t broadly represent Trump supporters. They turned up at politically charged events, in Cleveland for July’s Republican convention and outside Trump Tower itself in New York on Election Day. They are also voters who said yes to being interviewed on camera after I asked them (usually because my videographer-guts told me they’d talk—and, yes, perform well on camera).

Facebook and email discussions have already offered insightful speculation about the election, which I will share as I continue to monitor how—and if—my news feed changes as a result of my new friends.

Charles Juedemann (pictured here with his wife, Gloria): “The news is still saying that the uneducated people elected Trump. I wish I could give them a piece of my mind,” wrote Charles Juedemann, a retiree and Trump voter from Union, Missouri, whom I met in New York with his wife Gloria on Election Day. “I am an Electrical Engineer and Gloria has her specialist degree. Maybe we are a minority Trump supporter but I assure you, calling people uneducated is not the way to their heart.”

According to early analysis of exit polls, Trump rode a wave of support among white working-class voters in the Midwest to win the election. “The working people of the United States stood up and voted,” Juedemann wrote in a follow-up email. “I think many Americans felt we were losing identity and wanted to keep America as it was, where people worked and built things and contributed to the overall good of a Nation.”

Juedemann thinks voters like him are being divided and unfairly maligned by the press. He continues to be angered by Hillary Clinton’s description of some Trump supporters as “deplorable” during a September fundraiser. The media “claim racism, then education, then gender, then misunderstanding of the political process, and on and on,” he said. “Mr. Trump never said anything about the people who supported Hillary. He did not call them uneducated or deplorable. He did not place himself above other citizens.” 

“I invite you to come to visit us. We have the room and you could visit and see how someone in the Midwest lives and works,” Juedemann added. “You would be welcomed.”

Keith Kokal: I met Keith Kokal, from Timblerlake, Ohio, during the Republican convention in Cleveland earlier this year. He has never been on Facebook except to post his profile picture, so we chatted by email. “I am so glad to see a non-lawyer, outsider is going to be our next President!” he wrote.

Kokal, a manager at a plant that makes laboratory instruments, told me he is in the process of expanding his business as a result of the Trump victory. “The day after the election I ordered another machine for about $100,000 to support the future of manufacturing in the USA,” he wrote. “I wanted to buy this machine but if that lying bitch got elected I would held off until another year of so if I felt better about my country.”

Tim Graney: Perhaps the most enthusiastic of my new Facebook contacts is Tim Graney, a technology developer from Katy, Texas. He regularly posts long, detailed comments to my feed about the need for America to radically slash the size of government, reduce taxes and return power to the states. “I’m still waiting for the 25 percent of federal employees who were going to quit if Trump won. That would be a great start to cutting government programs and spending,” he wrote—inspiring spirited criticism from one of my friends who argued for the benefits of unionism and government-subsidized health care. “We may be about to discover that our entire government is about to be redefined in how it operates,” Graney observed. “Sometimes doing the same process for 40 years is the best practice—sometimes it’s not. Times are a changing!”

Jennifer Beckcom: A new addition to my Facebook feed, Beckcom was happy to get involved in my experiment to share different political perspectives. I met Beckcom, who describes herself as a housewife and local Republican activist from Texas, in Cleveland during the GOP convention. “It is the only way we can figure out how best to solve the many issues we all face,” she said. “Echo chambers are dangerous but I will warn you, once you step out of it, you will be shocked.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate